Drawing the Dao: Reflections on the application of Daoist theory of action in contemporary drawing practice

Q3 Arts and Humanities
S. Flavel, R. Luzar
{"title":"Drawing the Dao: Reflections on the application of Daoist theory of action in contemporary drawing practice","authors":"S. Flavel, R. Luzar","doi":"10.1386/DRTP.4.1.11_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we engage resources in Daoist philosophy as a means for critically investigating theories of drawing in contemporary arts practice. The aims of this article are twofold. First, we highlight the problematic metaphysical assumptions that inform contemporary drawing practice and its theorization around ‘performance’. In particular, we criticize the tendency to conceive such performance in terms of transcendent or mystical expression, and relatedly, through notions of unthinking or pre-conceptual bodily practice. We suggest that such practices, and their corresponding theories, problematically bifurcate between ‘thinking’ and ‘unthinking’ action, thereby reinforcing a substance-based metaphysics. Second, in response to this problem, we begin to outline how Daoist philosophies of action might provide a more robust theorization for undertaking such practices. We consider the philosophical implications of what Hans-Georg Moeller has termed ‘the Dao Scenario’, as a model for critical practice that can avoid such problematic mysticism.","PeriodicalId":36057,"journal":{"name":"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/DRTP.4.1.11_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this article, we engage resources in Daoist philosophy as a means for critically investigating theories of drawing in contemporary arts practice. The aims of this article are twofold. First, we highlight the problematic metaphysical assumptions that inform contemporary drawing practice and its theorization around ‘performance’. In particular, we criticize the tendency to conceive such performance in terms of transcendent or mystical expression, and relatedly, through notions of unthinking or pre-conceptual bodily practice. We suggest that such practices, and their corresponding theories, problematically bifurcate between ‘thinking’ and ‘unthinking’ action, thereby reinforcing a substance-based metaphysics. Second, in response to this problem, we begin to outline how Daoist philosophies of action might provide a more robust theorization for undertaking such practices. We consider the philosophical implications of what Hans-Georg Moeller has termed ‘the Dao Scenario’, as a model for critical practice that can avoid such problematic mysticism.
画刀:对道家行动理论在当代绘画实践中的运用的思考
在这篇文章中,我们利用道家哲学的资源,作为一种批判性地研究当代艺术实践中的绘画理论的手段。本文的目的是双重的。首先,我们强调了有问题的形而上学假设,这些假设为当代绘画实践及其围绕“表现”的理论化提供了信息。特别是,我们批评这种倾向,即通过超越或神秘的表达来构思这种表演,以及相关的,通过无意识或概念前的身体实践的概念。我们认为,这样的实践及其相应的理论,在“思考”和“不思考”行为之间存在分歧,从而强化了一种基于物质的形而上学。其次,作为对这个问题的回应,我们开始概述道家的行动哲学如何为开展此类实践提供更有力的理论。我们考虑Hans-Georg Moeller所称的“道情景”的哲学含义,作为批判实践的模型,可以避免这种有问题的神秘主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice
Drawing: Research, Theory, Practice Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信