Mauricio Sotomayor, Hassan J. Alshaer, Xiongyu Chen, Krishna K. Panthi, M. Balhoff, K. Mohanty
{"title":"Surfactant-Polymer Formulations for EOR in High Temperature High Salinity Carbonate Reservoirs","authors":"Mauricio Sotomayor, Hassan J. Alshaer, Xiongyu Chen, Krishna K. Panthi, M. Balhoff, K. Mohanty","doi":"10.2118/206321-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Harsh conditions, such as high temperature (>100 oC) and high salinity (>50,000 ppm TDS), can make the application of chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) challenging by causing many surfactants and polymers to degrade. Carbonate reservoirs also tend to have higher concentrations of divalent cations as well as positive surface charges that contribute to chemical degradation and surfactant adsorption. The objective of this work is to develop a surfactant-polymer (SP) formulation that can be injected with available hard brine, achieve ultra-low IFT in these harsh conditions, and yield low surfactant retention. Phase behavior experiments were performed to identify effective SP formulations. A combination of anionic and zwitterionic surfactants, cosolvents, brine, and oil was implemented in these tests. High molecular weight polymer was used in conjunction with the surfactant to provide a high viscosity and stable displacement during the chemical flood. Effective surfactant formulations were determined and five chemical floods were performed to test the oil recovery potential. The first two floods were performed using sandpacks from ground Indiana limestone while the other three floods used Indiana limestone cores. The sandpack experiments showed high oil recovery proving the effectiveness of the formulations, but the oil recovery was lower in the cores due to complex pore structure. The surfactant retention was high in the sandpacks, but it was lower in Indiana Limestone cores (0.29-0.39 mg/gm of rock). About 0.4 PV of surfactant slug was enough to achieve the oil recovery. A preflush of sodium polyacrylate improved the oil recovery.","PeriodicalId":10965,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, September 23, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206321-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Harsh conditions, such as high temperature (>100 oC) and high salinity (>50,000 ppm TDS), can make the application of chemical enhanced oil recovery (EOR) challenging by causing many surfactants and polymers to degrade. Carbonate reservoirs also tend to have higher concentrations of divalent cations as well as positive surface charges that contribute to chemical degradation and surfactant adsorption. The objective of this work is to develop a surfactant-polymer (SP) formulation that can be injected with available hard brine, achieve ultra-low IFT in these harsh conditions, and yield low surfactant retention. Phase behavior experiments were performed to identify effective SP formulations. A combination of anionic and zwitterionic surfactants, cosolvents, brine, and oil was implemented in these tests. High molecular weight polymer was used in conjunction with the surfactant to provide a high viscosity and stable displacement during the chemical flood. Effective surfactant formulations were determined and five chemical floods were performed to test the oil recovery potential. The first two floods were performed using sandpacks from ground Indiana limestone while the other three floods used Indiana limestone cores. The sandpack experiments showed high oil recovery proving the effectiveness of the formulations, but the oil recovery was lower in the cores due to complex pore structure. The surfactant retention was high in the sandpacks, but it was lower in Indiana Limestone cores (0.29-0.39 mg/gm of rock). About 0.4 PV of surfactant slug was enough to achieve the oil recovery. A preflush of sodium polyacrylate improved the oil recovery.