{"title":"The Stopping Power of Sources","authors":"Jonas J. Driedger","doi":"10.1515/auk-2023-2006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article analyzes arguments, made by John J. Mearsheimer and others, that the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was largely caused by Western policy. It finds that these arguments rely on a partially false and incomplete reading of history. To do so, the article identifies a range of premises that are both foundational to Mearsheimer’s claims and based on implied or explicit historical interpretations. This includes the varying policies of Ukraine toward NATO and the EU as well as the changing Russian perceptions thereof; the political upheavals in Ukraine in early 2014 that were immediately succeeded by the annexation of Crimea and the war in Donbass; and the supposed absence of Russian ‘imperialism’ toward Ukraine prior to 2014. Finding that these interpretations do not hold up in light of relevant and available data, the article qualifies and contextualizes the validity of Mearsheimer’s arguments, points to superior ones, and highlights the need for case-specific expertise when using explanatory theory to make sense of politically salient ongoing events.","PeriodicalId":35240,"journal":{"name":"Analyse und Kritik","volume":"254 1","pages":"137 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyse und Kritik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2023-2006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Abstract The article analyzes arguments, made by John J. Mearsheimer and others, that the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was largely caused by Western policy. It finds that these arguments rely on a partially false and incomplete reading of history. To do so, the article identifies a range of premises that are both foundational to Mearsheimer’s claims and based on implied or explicit historical interpretations. This includes the varying policies of Ukraine toward NATO and the EU as well as the changing Russian perceptions thereof; the political upheavals in Ukraine in early 2014 that were immediately succeeded by the annexation of Crimea and the war in Donbass; and the supposed absence of Russian ‘imperialism’ toward Ukraine prior to 2014. Finding that these interpretations do not hold up in light of relevant and available data, the article qualifies and contextualizes the validity of Mearsheimer’s arguments, points to superior ones, and highlights the need for case-specific expertise when using explanatory theory to make sense of politically salient ongoing events.
摘要:本文分析了John J. Mearsheimer等人关于俄罗斯在2022年入侵乌克兰主要是由西方政策造成的观点。它发现,这些论点是基于对历史的部分错误和不完整的解读。为此,本文确定了一系列前提,这些前提既是米尔斯海默主张的基础,也是基于隐含或明确的历史解释。这包括乌克兰对北约和欧盟政策的变化,以及俄罗斯对它们看法的变化;2014年初乌克兰的政治动荡,紧接着是吞并克里米亚和顿巴斯战争;以及在2014年之前,俄罗斯对乌克兰的“帝国主义”假定不存在。发现这些解释不能在相关和可用数据的基础上站住脚,文章对Mearsheimer论点的有效性进行了定性和背景化,指出了更好的论点,并强调了在使用解释性理论来理解政治上显著的正在发生的事件时,需要具体案例的专业知识。