Ecpoc: an evolutionary computation-based proof of criteria consensus protocol

Thang Nguyen, Hoang-Nam Dinh, Van-Thanh Nguyen, Bao Son Do, T. Nguyen, Ba-Lam Do
{"title":"Ecpoc: an evolutionary computation-based proof of criteria consensus protocol","authors":"Thang Nguyen, Hoang-Nam Dinh, Van-Thanh Nguyen, Bao Son Do, T. Nguyen, Ba-Lam Do","doi":"10.12928/ijio.v3i2.6049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, blockchain technology has been applied in many domains in our life. Blockchain networks typically utilize a consensus protocol to achieve consistency among network nodes in a decentralized environment. Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) is a popular mechanism adopted in many networks such as BitShares, EOS, and Cardano because of its speed and scalability advantages. However, votes that come from nodes on a DPoS network tend to support a set of specific nodes that have a greater chance of becoming block producers after voting rounds. Therefore, only a small group of nodes can be selected to become block producers. To address this issue, we propose a new protocol called Evolutionary Computation-based Proof of Criteria (ECPoC), which uses ten criteria to evaluate and select a new block procedure in each round. Next, a set of optimal weights used for maximizing the network’s decentralization level is identified through the use of evolutionary computation algorithms. The experimental results show that our consensus significantly enhances the degree of decentralization in the selection process of witness nodes compared to DPoS. As a result, ECPoC facilitates fairness between nodes and creates momentum for blockchain network development","PeriodicalId":52674,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Electronics Control and Optimization","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Electronics Control and Optimization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12928/ijio.v3i2.6049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recently, blockchain technology has been applied in many domains in our life. Blockchain networks typically utilize a consensus protocol to achieve consistency among network nodes in a decentralized environment. Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) is a popular mechanism adopted in many networks such as BitShares, EOS, and Cardano because of its speed and scalability advantages. However, votes that come from nodes on a DPoS network tend to support a set of specific nodes that have a greater chance of becoming block producers after voting rounds. Therefore, only a small group of nodes can be selected to become block producers. To address this issue, we propose a new protocol called Evolutionary Computation-based Proof of Criteria (ECPoC), which uses ten criteria to evaluate and select a new block procedure in each round. Next, a set of optimal weights used for maximizing the network’s decentralization level is identified through the use of evolutionary computation algorithms. The experimental results show that our consensus significantly enhances the degree of decentralization in the selection process of witness nodes compared to DPoS. As a result, ECPoC facilitates fairness between nodes and creates momentum for blockchain network development
Ecpoc:一种基于进化计算的标准证明共识协议
最近,区块链技术已经在我们生活中的许多领域得到了应用。区块链网络通常利用共识协议在分散的环境中实现网络节点之间的一致性。委托权益证明(DPoS)是许多网络(如BitShares, EOS和Cardano)采用的流行机制,因为它具有速度和可扩展性优势。然而,来自DPoS网络上节点的投票倾向于支持一组特定节点,这些节点在投票轮之后更有可能成为区块生产者。因此,只有一小部分节点可以被选中成为区块生产者。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种新的协议,称为基于进化计算的标准证明(ECPoC),它使用十个标准来评估和选择每轮新的区块过程。接下来,通过使用进化计算算法确定一组用于最大化网络分散级别的最优权重。实验结果表明,与DPoS相比,我们的共识显著增强了见证节点选择过程中的去中心化程度。因此,ECPoC促进了节点之间的公平,并为区块链网络的发展创造了动力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信