In vitro comparison of two methods of anchoring the vagina during the Burch procedure

Philippe Simon, Patrick Salvia, Caroline Fellemans, Frédéric Buxant, Vincent Anaf
{"title":"In vitro comparison of two methods of anchoring the vagina during the Burch procedure","authors":"Philippe Simon,&nbsp;Patrick Salvia,&nbsp;Caroline Fellemans,&nbsp;Frédéric Buxant,&nbsp;Vincent Anaf","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00446.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To compare the quality of the vaginal attachment of classical Burch anterior colposuspension with laparoscopic colposuspension with polyester mesh fixed with tackers.</p><p>The study was performed on three fresh cadavers. The extension and the strength of polyester braided fibre (Ticron) sutures on one side were compared with those of polyester mesh (Mersilene) tacked into the Burch site on the other side, by means of progressive traction measured by a linear transducer.</p><p>When progressive traction was applied in the two systems studied, both displayed moderate elongation. The Mersilene mesh appeared to be significantly more elongated than Ticron suture, with a partial return to the original length. In no case (Ticron suture or tacked Mersilene mesh) was a rupture of the vaginal fixation seen, when traction of up to 2 kg was applied.</p><p>Mersilene mesh appears to elongate more than the classical suture when placed under traction. This casts doubt on the quality of the suspension obtained, even though no rupture was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 4","pages":"229-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00446.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00446.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare the quality of the vaginal attachment of classical Burch anterior colposuspension with laparoscopic colposuspension with polyester mesh fixed with tackers.

The study was performed on three fresh cadavers. The extension and the strength of polyester braided fibre (Ticron) sutures on one side were compared with those of polyester mesh (Mersilene) tacked into the Burch site on the other side, by means of progressive traction measured by a linear transducer.

When progressive traction was applied in the two systems studied, both displayed moderate elongation. The Mersilene mesh appeared to be significantly more elongated than Ticron suture, with a partial return to the original length. In no case (Ticron suture or tacked Mersilene mesh) was a rupture of the vaginal fixation seen, when traction of up to 2 kg was applied.

Mersilene mesh appears to elongate more than the classical suture when placed under traction. This casts doubt on the quality of the suspension obtained, even though no rupture was observed.

Burch手术中两种阴道锚定方法的体外比较
比较经典Burch前阴道悬吊术与腹腔镜下涤纶网固定式阴道悬吊术阴道附着质量。这项研究是在三具新鲜的尸体上进行的。通过线性传感器测量的逐步牵引,将一侧聚酯编织纤维(Ticron)缝合线与另一侧粘接在Burch部位的聚酯网(Mersilene)缝合线的延伸和强度进行比较。当在两个系统中应用渐进式牵引时,都显示出适度的伸长。Mersilene补片明显比Ticron缝线拉长,部分恢复到原来的长度。当牵引力达到2 kg时,没有一例阴道固定物破裂(Ticron缝线或钉钉Mersilene补片)。在牵引下放置时,美丝烯网看起来比传统缝线更长。这使人们怀疑所获得的悬浮液的质量,即使没有观察到破裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信