Intralesional Steroid Injection Therapy for Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture Following Esophageal Atresia Repair.

P. Ngo, Ali Kamran, Susannah J. Clark, R. Jennings, Thomas E. Hamilton, C. Smithers, B. Zendejas, Jessica L Yasuda, D. Zurakowski, M. Manfredi
{"title":"Intralesional Steroid Injection Therapy for Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture Following Esophageal Atresia Repair.","authors":"P. Ngo, Ali Kamran, Susannah J. Clark, R. Jennings, Thomas E. Hamilton, C. Smithers, B. Zendejas, Jessica L Yasuda, D. Zurakowski, M. Manfredi","doi":"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nThe role of intralesional steroid injection (ISI) in the treatment of anastomotic stricture in esophageal atresia (EA) patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ISI.\n\n\nMETHODS\n158 EA patients with at least one ISI for the treatment of esophageal anastomotic stricture between 2010 and 2017 were identified. The change in stricture diameter (ΔD) was compared between procedures with dilation alone (ISI-) and dilation with steroid injection (ISI+).\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 1055 balloon dilations were performed (452 ISI+). The median ΔD was significantly greater in the ISI+ group: 1 mm (IQR 0, 3) vs. 0 mm (IQR -1, 1.5) (P < 0.0001). The ISI+ group had greater percentage of improved diameter (P < 0.0001) and lesser percentages of unchanged and decreased diameters at subsequent endoscopy (P = 0.0009, P = 0.003). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed the significance of ISI on increasing the likelihood of improved stricture diameter with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.24 (95% CI: 2.15-4.88) (P < 0.001). The ΔD for the first 3 ISI+ procedures was greater than the ΔD for subsequent ISI+ procedures: 1 mm (IQR 0, 3) vs. 0.5 mm (IQR -1.25, 2) (P = 0.001). There was no difference in perforation incidence between ISI+ and ISI- groups (P = 0.82).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nISI with dilation was well tolerated and improved anastomotic stricture diameter more than dilation alone. The benefit of ISI over dilation alone was limited to the first 3 ISI procedures.","PeriodicalId":16725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The role of intralesional steroid injection (ISI) in the treatment of anastomotic stricture in esophageal atresia (EA) patients remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ISI. METHODS 158 EA patients with at least one ISI for the treatment of esophageal anastomotic stricture between 2010 and 2017 were identified. The change in stricture diameter (ΔD) was compared between procedures with dilation alone (ISI-) and dilation with steroid injection (ISI+). RESULTS A total of 1055 balloon dilations were performed (452 ISI+). The median ΔD was significantly greater in the ISI+ group: 1 mm (IQR 0, 3) vs. 0 mm (IQR -1, 1.5) (P < 0.0001). The ISI+ group had greater percentage of improved diameter (P < 0.0001) and lesser percentages of unchanged and decreased diameters at subsequent endoscopy (P = 0.0009, P = 0.003). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed the significance of ISI on increasing the likelihood of improved stricture diameter with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.24 (95% CI: 2.15-4.88) (P < 0.001). The ΔD for the first 3 ISI+ procedures was greater than the ΔD for subsequent ISI+ procedures: 1 mm (IQR 0, 3) vs. 0.5 mm (IQR -1.25, 2) (P = 0.001). There was no difference in perforation incidence between ISI+ and ISI- groups (P = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS ISI with dilation was well tolerated and improved anastomotic stricture diameter more than dilation alone. The benefit of ISI over dilation alone was limited to the first 3 ISI procedures.
食道闭锁修复后食管吻合口狭窄局内类固醇注射治疗。
目的病灶内类固醇注射(ISI)在食管闭锁(EA)患者吻合口狭窄治疗中的作用尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评价ISI的有效性和安全性。方法选取2010 ~ 2017年间,应用至少一种ISI治疗食管吻合口狭窄的EA患者158例。比较单纯扩张术(ISI-)和类固醇注射扩张术(ISI+)的狭窄直径变化(ΔD)。结果共行球囊扩张1055例,其中ISI+ 452例。ISI+组的中位ΔD显著增大:1 mm (IQR 0,3) vs. 0 mm (IQR - 1,1.5) (P < 0.0001)。ISI+组在随后的内镜检查中,直径改善的百分比更高(P < 0.0001),直径不变和减小的百分比更低(P = 0.0009, P = 0.003)。多变量logistic回归证实了ISI对提高狭窄直径改善可能性的显著性,校正比值比为3.24 (95% CI: 2.15-4.88) (P < 0.001)。前3次ISI+手术的ΔD大于后续ISI+手术的ΔD: 1 mm (IQR 0,3) vs. 0.5 mm (IQR -1.25, 2) (P = 0.001)。ISI+组与ISI-组穿孔发生率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.82)。结论sisi联合扩张术耐受性良好,比单纯扩张术更能改善吻合口狭窄直径。ISI优于单纯扩张的益处仅限于前3次ISI手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信