The Accuracy of Early Post-Operative Abdominal CT Scan

M. Shpoliansky, Y. Nevo, Y. Klein, M. Amitai
{"title":"The Accuracy of Early Post-Operative Abdominal CT Scan","authors":"M. Shpoliansky, Y. Nevo, Y. Klein, M. Amitai","doi":"10.12691/js-7-1-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Data is lacking regarding the optimal CT timing for diagnosing intra-abdominal post-operative complications. Our aim was to examine the accuracy of CT imaging performed in the early post-operative period (POD 1-5) compared to late post-operative period (POD 6-14), in the detection of post-operative complications. Methods: Post-operative CT scans performed in the first 14 days following abdominal surgery, between 2011 and 2013 were reviewed and divided into two groups: early CT scans performed at POD 1-5 and late CT scans performed at POD 6-14. Analysis included clinical and laboratory parameters, radiologic findings and assessment of post-operative course according to CT scan results. Results: 318 CT scans were performed. The rate of repeated CT scans was higher in the patients included in the early CT scan group compared to the late CT scan group (23.1% vs. 11.2%, p=0.013). There were more re-operations in the early CT group, with no statistical difference (12.8% vs. 7.9%, p=0.23), whereas drainage procedures were more frequent in the late CT group (22.1% vs. 9.0%, p=0.008). Early CT scans were less sensitive in detecting post-operative GI complications (56% vs. 73%, p=0.018). The accuracy to detect post-operative complications was similar between the groups (83% vs. 88%, p=0.42). Conclusion: CT scans performed in the early post-operative period are less sensitive and tend to necessitate repeated scans. The accuracy of abdominal CT examination in detecting post-operative GI complications was not found to be statistically different between the early and late CT scan groups.","PeriodicalId":89556,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/js-7-1-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data is lacking regarding the optimal CT timing for diagnosing intra-abdominal post-operative complications. Our aim was to examine the accuracy of CT imaging performed in the early post-operative period (POD 1-5) compared to late post-operative period (POD 6-14), in the detection of post-operative complications. Methods: Post-operative CT scans performed in the first 14 days following abdominal surgery, between 2011 and 2013 were reviewed and divided into two groups: early CT scans performed at POD 1-5 and late CT scans performed at POD 6-14. Analysis included clinical and laboratory parameters, radiologic findings and assessment of post-operative course according to CT scan results. Results: 318 CT scans were performed. The rate of repeated CT scans was higher in the patients included in the early CT scan group compared to the late CT scan group (23.1% vs. 11.2%, p=0.013). There were more re-operations in the early CT group, with no statistical difference (12.8% vs. 7.9%, p=0.23), whereas drainage procedures were more frequent in the late CT group (22.1% vs. 9.0%, p=0.008). Early CT scans were less sensitive in detecting post-operative GI complications (56% vs. 73%, p=0.018). The accuracy to detect post-operative complications was similar between the groups (83% vs. 88%, p=0.42). Conclusion: CT scans performed in the early post-operative period are less sensitive and tend to necessitate repeated scans. The accuracy of abdominal CT examination in detecting post-operative GI complications was not found to be statistically different between the early and late CT scan groups.
术后早期腹部CT扫描的准确性
背景:腹内术后并发症的最佳CT诊断时机缺乏相关资料。我们的目的是比较术后早期(POD 1-5)和后期(POD 6-14) CT成像在发现术后并发症方面的准确性。方法:回顾2011 - 2013年腹部手术后14天的CT扫描,分为两组:POD 1-5的早期CT扫描和POD 6-14的晚期CT扫描。分析包括临床和实验室参数、影像学表现以及根据CT扫描结果评估术后病程。结果:共行318次CT扫描。早期CT扫描组患者的重复CT扫描率高于晚期CT扫描组(23.1%比11.2%,p=0.013)。早期CT组再次手术较多,差异无统计学意义(12.8% vs. 7.9%, p=0.23),而晚期CT组引流手术较多(22.1% vs. 9.0%, p=0.008)。早期CT扫描对术后胃肠道并发症的检测敏感度较低(56%对73%,p=0.018)。两组术后并发症的检测准确率相似(83% vs. 88%, p=0.42)。结论:术后早期CT扫描敏感性较低,需要反复扫描。腹部CT检查发现术后胃肠道并发症的准确率在早期和晚期CT扫描组之间无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信