Combination of mifepristone and misoprostol vs misoprostol monotherapy for treatment of second-trimester pregnancy loss

Irene Valero, R. García-Jiménez, A. M. Weber-Fernandez, Rocío Díaz-Acedo, María José Fobelo-Lozano, L. Cerrillos, Rosa Ostos
{"title":"Combination of mifepristone and misoprostol vs misoprostol monotherapy for treatment of second-trimester pregnancy loss","authors":"Irene Valero, R. García-Jiménez, A. M. Weber-Fernandez, Rocío Díaz-Acedo, María José Fobelo-Lozano, L. Cerrillos, Rosa Ostos","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2022.2054982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective Our main goal was to evaluate whether a treatment protocol based on the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol for second-trimester foetal loss was more effective than misoprostol monotherapy. Methods This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional two-centre study of women receiving treatment for second-trimester pregnancy loss. Patients were recruited in two centres that used different treatment protocols: combined mifepristone–misoprostol treatment or misoprostol monotherapy. Results A total of 99 patients were included in the study: 41 in the mifepristone–misoprostol combined treatment group and 58 in the misoprostol monotherapy group. The combined treatment group had shorter times to expulsion and shorter hospitalisations, as well as higher rates of hospital discharge within 24 h and complete abortion within the first 6 h and 12 h. There were no differences regarding secondary effects and complication rates. Conclusion A combination of mifepristone and misoprostol appears to be a feasible option for the treatment of second-trimester pregnancy loss.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"113 1","pages":"341 - 344"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2022.2054982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objective Our main goal was to evaluate whether a treatment protocol based on the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol for second-trimester foetal loss was more effective than misoprostol monotherapy. Methods This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional two-centre study of women receiving treatment for second-trimester pregnancy loss. Patients were recruited in two centres that used different treatment protocols: combined mifepristone–misoprostol treatment or misoprostol monotherapy. Results A total of 99 patients were included in the study: 41 in the mifepristone–misoprostol combined treatment group and 58 in the misoprostol monotherapy group. The combined treatment group had shorter times to expulsion and shorter hospitalisations, as well as higher rates of hospital discharge within 24 h and complete abortion within the first 6 h and 12 h. There were no differences regarding secondary effects and complication rates. Conclusion A combination of mifepristone and misoprostol appears to be a feasible option for the treatment of second-trimester pregnancy loss.
米非司酮联合米索前列醇与米索前列醇单药治疗中期妊娠丢失的比较
摘要目的评价米非司酮联合米索前列醇治疗中期妊娠胎儿丢失是否比米索前列醇单药治疗更有效。方法:本研究是一项观察性、回顾性、横断面双中心研究,研究对象为接受妊娠中期流产治疗的妇女。患者在两个使用不同治疗方案的中心招募:米非司酮-米索前列醇联合治疗或米索前列醇单药治疗。结果共纳入99例患者:米非司酮-米索前列醇联合治疗组41例,米索前列醇单药治疗组58例。联合治疗组分娩时间更短,住院时间更短,24小时内出院率更高,前6小时和12小时内完全流产率更高。在继发性反应和并发症发生率方面没有差异。结论米非司酮联合米索前列醇是治疗中期妊娠流产的可行方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信