A Comparison of GOES Sounder– and Cloud Lidar- and Radar-Retrieved Cloud-Top Heights

James A. Hawkinson, W. Feltz, S. Ackerman
{"title":"A Comparison of GOES Sounder– and Cloud Lidar- and Radar-Retrieved Cloud-Top Heights","authors":"James A. Hawkinson, W. Feltz, S. Ackerman","doi":"10.1175/JAM2269.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An assessment of the performance of the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) sounder cloud-top pressure product is presented. GOES sounder cloud-top-height data were compared with values derived from a consensus cloud boundary dataset that utilizes data from a cloud lidar and a cloud radar located at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program’s Cloud and Radiation Test Bed (CART) site in Lamont, Oklahoma. Comparisons were performed from April 2000 to March 2002. A temporal filtering process was applied to the cloud lidar and cloud radar output so that a representative picture of the cloud field on the same spatial scale of the GOES sounder could be derived. Comparisons between the GOES sounder and ground-based cloud boundary measurements yielded a mean difference of 1772 m and a standard deviation of 1733 m. The difference between GOES cloud-top-height and ground-based retrievals is within ±500 m for 22% of the retrievals and within...","PeriodicalId":15026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Meteorology","volume":"5 1","pages":"1234-1242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2269.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Abstract An assessment of the performance of the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) sounder cloud-top pressure product is presented. GOES sounder cloud-top-height data were compared with values derived from a consensus cloud boundary dataset that utilizes data from a cloud lidar and a cloud radar located at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program’s Cloud and Radiation Test Bed (CART) site in Lamont, Oklahoma. Comparisons were performed from April 2000 to March 2002. A temporal filtering process was applied to the cloud lidar and cloud radar output so that a representative picture of the cloud field on the same spatial scale of the GOES sounder could be derived. Comparisons between the GOES sounder and ground-based cloud boundary measurements yielded a mean difference of 1772 m and a standard deviation of 1733 m. The difference between GOES cloud-top-height and ground-based retrievals is within ±500 m for 22% of the retrievals and within...
GOES探测仪和云激光雷达与雷达检索的云顶高度的比较
摘要对地球静止运行环境卫星(GOES)探测仪云顶压力产品的性能进行了评估。GOES探测仪的云顶高度数据与来自共识云边界数据集的数据进行了比较,该数据集利用了位于美国能源部(DOE)大气辐射测量(ARM)项目云和辐射试验台(CART)站点的云激光雷达和云雷达的数据。从2000年4月到2002年3月进行了比较。对云激光雷达和云雷达输出数据进行时间滤波处理,得到GOES探测仪在相同空间尺度上的云场代表性图像。GOES探测仪与地面云边界测量结果的比较得出的平均差值为1772米,标准差为1733米。GOES云顶高度与地面反演的差值在±500 m以内,占22%;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信