Numerical Evaluation of Longitudinal Modulus of Elasticity of Eucalyptus g randis Timber Beams

A. Christoforo, F. Lahr, E. Morales, T. Panzera, P. H. Borges
{"title":"Numerical Evaluation of Longitudinal Modulus of Elasticity of Eucalyptus g randis Timber Beams","authors":"A. Christoforo, F. Lahr, E. Morales, T. Panzera, P. H. Borges","doi":"10.5923/J.IJAF.20120204.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the standard NBR 7190:1997 (Design of Wood Structures) makes no reference to any test aimed to determine the stiffness and strength of structural-sized lumber components, restricting this analysis to small and clear specimens. Methodologies proposed by international standard do not include optimum criteria in their calculation models. This study presents an alternative methodology to determine the longitudinal modulus of elasticity in Eucalyptus grandis timber beams, based on a combination between the Finite Element and the Least Square Methods. Besides the use of nu- merical methods, the modulus of elasticity was also analytically obtained by the equation presented in NBR 7190:1997, concerning the static three-point bending test, adapted to a non-destructive testing condition. Results found for the elastic modulus for the Eucalyptus grandis species showed statistical equivalence between the methodologies, which implies the reliability of using Brazilian standard for the characterization of structural components subjected to bending. However, these results cannot be extended for other woods from the same species or different species, justifying the use of the numerical calculation approach discussed in this paper.","PeriodicalId":13804,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry","volume":"32 1","pages":"166-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5923/J.IJAF.20120204.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Currently, the standard NBR 7190:1997 (Design of Wood Structures) makes no reference to any test aimed to determine the stiffness and strength of structural-sized lumber components, restricting this analysis to small and clear specimens. Methodologies proposed by international standard do not include optimum criteria in their calculation models. This study presents an alternative methodology to determine the longitudinal modulus of elasticity in Eucalyptus grandis timber beams, based on a combination between the Finite Element and the Least Square Methods. Besides the use of nu- merical methods, the modulus of elasticity was also analytically obtained by the equation presented in NBR 7190:1997, concerning the static three-point bending test, adapted to a non-destructive testing condition. Results found for the elastic modulus for the Eucalyptus grandis species showed statistical equivalence between the methodologies, which implies the reliability of using Brazilian standard for the characterization of structural components subjected to bending. However, these results cannot be extended for other woods from the same species or different species, justifying the use of the numerical calculation approach discussed in this paper.
桉木梁纵向弹性模量的数值计算
目前,标准NBR 7190:1997(木结构设计)没有提到任何旨在确定结构尺寸木材部件的刚度和强度的测试,将这种分析限制在小而清晰的样品上。国际标准提出的方法在其计算模型中没有包括最优准则。本研究提出了一种替代方法来确定桉树木梁的纵向弹性模量,基于有限元和最小二乘法之间的结合。除了采用数值方法外,还采用NBR 7190:1997中关于静力三点弯曲试验的公式解析得到弹性模量,该公式适用于无损检测条件。结果发现,大桉树物种的弹性模量显示了方法之间的统计等效,这意味着使用巴西标准来表征结构部件受弯曲的可靠性。然而,这些结果不能推广到来自同一物种或不同物种的其他木材,证明使用本文讨论的数值计算方法是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信