COMPARISON OF POST OPERATIVE PAIN WITH EFFICACY OF INTRAVENOUS ACETAMINOPHEN VERSUS KETAMINE AMONG PATIENTS UNDERGOING ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY

Ikram Umar Buttar, M. Ikram, M. Kashif
{"title":"COMPARISON OF POST OPERATIVE PAIN WITH EFFICACY OF INTRAVENOUS ACETAMINOPHEN VERSUS KETAMINE AMONG PATIENTS UNDERGOING ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY","authors":"Ikram Umar Buttar, M. Ikram, M. Kashif","doi":"10.7176/jmpb/67-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective; To determine the effectiveness in terms of postoperative pain with intravenous acetaminophen versus ketamine among women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Material and Methods; A total of 114 women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were taken in this study. The study was conducted at Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore and DHQ Hospital Dera Ghazi Khan. Data was analyzed with statistical analysis program (SPSS version 21). Analysis was done to compare proportion of acetaminophen group and ketamine group. Chi-square test was applied to compare both groups in terms of efficacy taken p ≤0.05 as significant. Results; Our study comprised of 114 ladies undergoing abdominal hysterectomy, mean age of the study cases was 54.13 ± 6.89 years (with minimum age of the patients was 39 years while maximum age was 68 years). Majority of our study cases i.e. 92 (80.7 %) had parity more than 3 and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score level 1 in 93 (81.6%). Sixty one (53.1%) belonged to rural areas, while mean duration of surgery was 72.80 ± 11.32 minutes. Mean BMI level in our study cases was noted to be 23.98 ±4.17 Kg/m 2 and obesity was present in 34 (29.8%) of our study cases. Efficacy was noted in 60 (52.6 %) of our study cases. Efficacy was 73.7% study cases in group A while 18 (31.6%) in group B (p=0.000). Conclusion; Our study results support the use of intravenous acetaminophen (IVA) for pain management in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy compared with ketamine. Intravenous acetaminophen is safe, reliable and effective for the pain management in postoperative abdominal hysterectomy patients which was associated with shorter hospital stay and cost effective for the suffering families. No adverse reactions were noted in this study with the use of intravenous acetaminophen. Keywords; Intravenous acetaminophen, Ketamine, Abdominal Hysterectomy. DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/67-04 Publication date: August 31 st 2020","PeriodicalId":16339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/jmpb/67-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective; To determine the effectiveness in terms of postoperative pain with intravenous acetaminophen versus ketamine among women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Material and Methods; A total of 114 women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy were taken in this study. The study was conducted at Akhtar Saeed Trust Hospital, Lahore and DHQ Hospital Dera Ghazi Khan. Data was analyzed with statistical analysis program (SPSS version 21). Analysis was done to compare proportion of acetaminophen group and ketamine group. Chi-square test was applied to compare both groups in terms of efficacy taken p ≤0.05 as significant. Results; Our study comprised of 114 ladies undergoing abdominal hysterectomy, mean age of the study cases was 54.13 ± 6.89 years (with minimum age of the patients was 39 years while maximum age was 68 years). Majority of our study cases i.e. 92 (80.7 %) had parity more than 3 and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score level 1 in 93 (81.6%). Sixty one (53.1%) belonged to rural areas, while mean duration of surgery was 72.80 ± 11.32 minutes. Mean BMI level in our study cases was noted to be 23.98 ±4.17 Kg/m 2 and obesity was present in 34 (29.8%) of our study cases. Efficacy was noted in 60 (52.6 %) of our study cases. Efficacy was 73.7% study cases in group A while 18 (31.6%) in group B (p=0.000). Conclusion; Our study results support the use of intravenous acetaminophen (IVA) for pain management in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy compared with ketamine. Intravenous acetaminophen is safe, reliable and effective for the pain management in postoperative abdominal hysterectomy patients which was associated with shorter hospital stay and cost effective for the suffering families. No adverse reactions were noted in this study with the use of intravenous acetaminophen. Keywords; Intravenous acetaminophen, Ketamine, Abdominal Hysterectomy. DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/67-04 Publication date: August 31 st 2020
腹式子宫切除术患者术后疼痛及静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚与氯胺酮的疗效比较
客观的;目的:探讨对乙酰氨基酚与氯胺酮对腹部子宫切除术妇女术后疼痛的影响。材料与方法;本研究共收集了114例接受腹部子宫切除术的妇女。这项研究是在拉合尔的Akhtar Saeed信托医院和Dera Ghazi Khan DHQ医院进行的。数据分析采用统计分析程序(SPSS version 21)。分析比较对乙酰氨基酚组与氯胺酮组的比例。两组疗效比较采用卡方检验,p≤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果;我们的研究包括114例接受腹部子宫切除术的女性,研究病例的平均年龄为54.13±6.89岁(最小年龄39岁,最大年龄68岁)。我们的大多数研究病例,即92例(80.7%)的胎次大于3,93例(81.6%)的美国麻醉学会(ASA)评分为1。农村61例(53.1%),平均手术时间72.80±11.32 min。我们研究病例的平均BMI水平为23.98±4.17 Kg/ m2, 34例(29.8%)存在肥胖。我们的研究病例中有60例(52.6%)有效率。A组有效率为73.7%,B组有效率为18例(31.6%)(p=0.000)。结论;我们的研究结果支持与氯胺酮相比,静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚(IVA)用于腹部子宫切除术患者的疼痛管理。静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚治疗腹部子宫切除术后疼痛安全、可靠、有效,缩短住院时间,对患者家属具有成本效益。本研究未发现静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚的不良反应。关键字;静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚,氯胺酮,腹部子宫切除术。DOI: 10.7176/JMPB/67-04出版日期:2020年8月31日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信