From Needs to Strengths: Operationalizing an Assets-Based Design of Technology

Marisol Wong-Villacrés, Aakash Gautam, Wendy Roldan, Lucy Pei, Jessa Dickinson, Azra Ismail, Betsy Disalvo, Neha Kumar, Tamara L. Clegg, S. Erete, Emily Roden, Nithya Sambasivan, Jason C. Yip
{"title":"From Needs to Strengths: Operationalizing an Assets-Based Design of Technology","authors":"Marisol Wong-Villacrés, Aakash Gautam, Wendy Roldan, Lucy Pei, Jessa Dickinson, Azra Ismail, Betsy Disalvo, Neha Kumar, Tamara L. Clegg, S. Erete, Emily Roden, Nithya Sambasivan, Jason C. Yip","doi":"10.1145/3406865.3418594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guided by a human-centered design focus on users' needs, Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW) research and practice have increasingly explored how to address the multiple inequities affecting historically marginalized groups. A growing body of CSCW and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research, building upon education and community development literature, argues that centering on needs dismisses marginalized users' capacity for driving change. Needs-based views often lead to designs for the \"here and now,'' further marginalizing populations and perpetuating stereotypes. In contrast, an assets-based approach that puts users' knowledge, strengths, and capacities---\\textitassets ---at the core of design can better promote sustained impact. Translating assets into meaningful designs that interact with intersecting systems of oppression, however, raises critical questions:What are assets? Whose assets are privileged? What ethical considerations surface when facilitating assets-based reflections? How can an assets-based design tackle systems-level problems? In this workshop, we will bring together researchers and industry actors to explore the implications of assets-based perspectives across domains, including Education, Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD), and Participatory Design (PD). Specifically, we will work to develop guidelines and methodologies for CSCW researchers and designers to identify when and how to pursue an assets-based approach, navigating issues of power to translate assets into design effectively.","PeriodicalId":93424,"journal":{"name":"CSCW '20 Companion : conference companion publication of the 2020 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing : October 17-21, 2020, Virtual Event, USA. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and So...","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CSCW '20 Companion : conference companion publication of the 2020 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing : October 17-21, 2020, Virtual Event, USA. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and So...","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3418594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Guided by a human-centered design focus on users' needs, Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (CSCW) research and practice have increasingly explored how to address the multiple inequities affecting historically marginalized groups. A growing body of CSCW and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research, building upon education and community development literature, argues that centering on needs dismisses marginalized users' capacity for driving change. Needs-based views often lead to designs for the "here and now,'' further marginalizing populations and perpetuating stereotypes. In contrast, an assets-based approach that puts users' knowledge, strengths, and capacities---\textitassets ---at the core of design can better promote sustained impact. Translating assets into meaningful designs that interact with intersecting systems of oppression, however, raises critical questions:What are assets? Whose assets are privileged? What ethical considerations surface when facilitating assets-based reflections? How can an assets-based design tackle systems-level problems? In this workshop, we will bring together researchers and industry actors to explore the implications of assets-based perspectives across domains, including Education, Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD), and Participatory Design (PD). Specifically, we will work to develop guidelines and methodologies for CSCW researchers and designers to identify when and how to pursue an assets-based approach, navigating issues of power to translate assets into design effectively.
从需求到优势:基于资产的技术设计的可操作性
计算机支持的协同工作(CSCW)的研究和实践越来越多地探索如何解决影响历史上边缘化群体的多重不平等现象。在教育和社区发展文献的基础上,越来越多的CSCW和人机交互(HCI)研究认为,以需求为中心忽视了边缘化用户推动变革的能力。基于需求的观点往往会导致“此时此地”的设计,进一步边缘化人群并使刻板印象永久化。相比之下,基于资产的方法将用户的知识、优势和能力(文本资产)置于设计的核心,可以更好地促进持续的影响。然而,将资产转化为有意义的设计,并与相互交叉的压迫系统相互作用,就会引发关键问题:什么是资产?谁的资产享有特权?在促进基于资产的反思时,会出现哪些伦理考虑?基于资产的设计如何解决系统级问题?在本次研讨会上,我们将汇集研究人员和行业参与者,探讨跨领域的基于资产的观点的影响,包括教育、信息和通信技术与发展(ICTD)和参与式设计(PD)。具体来说,我们将致力于为CSCW研究人员和设计师制定指导方针和方法,以确定何时以及如何采用基于资产的方法,引导权力问题将资产有效地转化为设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信