An Operational Efficiency Assessment of E-Trike and Motorized Tricycles as Public Utility Vehicles

Anna Liza C. Nacion
{"title":"An Operational Efficiency Assessment of E-Trike and Motorized Tricycles as Public Utility Vehicles","authors":"Anna Liza C. Nacion","doi":"10.35940/ijeat.a3855.1012122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study focused on the operational efficiency of e-trikes and motorized tricycles as public utility vehicles, leading to the analytical comparison of the data gathered. The comparative analysis on both tricycles reveals that e-trikes are more efficient and safer, consume zero fuel, and almost double in passenger capacity when compared to the motorized tricycle. Further, e-trike can enter narrower streets or alley easily for having lesser width. On the other hand, motorized tricycles are faster and can reach higher kilometrage and with a shorter length, it has no problems on approaching slopes and bumps. M/M/1 was used to evaluate the service performance of the electrical and motorized tricycles in the terminal. The results show that the e-trike terminal service rate is more efficient than that of the motorized terminal where commuters spent lesser time waiting to be served. The study recommends the need to understand further the effects, advantages, and disadvantages of both tricycles as regard the planned implementation in the mode of public transportation system. Additionally, further study may be needed focusing on the economic and environmental sustainability, and the use of renewable resources to contribute on the sustainable development and increase operational efficiency of PUVs.","PeriodicalId":13981,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.a3855.1012122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study focused on the operational efficiency of e-trikes and motorized tricycles as public utility vehicles, leading to the analytical comparison of the data gathered. The comparative analysis on both tricycles reveals that e-trikes are more efficient and safer, consume zero fuel, and almost double in passenger capacity when compared to the motorized tricycle. Further, e-trike can enter narrower streets or alley easily for having lesser width. On the other hand, motorized tricycles are faster and can reach higher kilometrage and with a shorter length, it has no problems on approaching slopes and bumps. M/M/1 was used to evaluate the service performance of the electrical and motorized tricycles in the terminal. The results show that the e-trike terminal service rate is more efficient than that of the motorized terminal where commuters spent lesser time waiting to be served. The study recommends the need to understand further the effects, advantages, and disadvantages of both tricycles as regard the planned implementation in the mode of public transportation system. Additionally, further study may be needed focusing on the economic and environmental sustainability, and the use of renewable resources to contribute on the sustainable development and increase operational efficiency of PUVs.
电动三轮车和机动三轮车作为公共交通工具的运行效率评价
该研究侧重于电动三轮车和机动三轮车作为公用事业车辆的运行效率,从而对收集到的数据进行分析比较。对两种三轮车的对比分析表明,电动三轮车更高效、更安全,零油耗,载客量几乎是电动三轮车的两倍。此外,电动三轮车的宽度较小,可以很容易地进入较窄的街道或小巷。另一方面,机动三轮车速度更快,可以达到更高的公里,而且长度更短,在接近斜坡和颠簸时没有问题。采用M/M/1对码头电动三轮车和机动三轮车的使用性能进行了评价。结果表明,电动三轮车终端的服务效率高于电动三轮车终端,通勤者等待服务的时间更短。该研究建议有必要进一步了解这两种三轮车在公共交通系统中计划实施的影响、优点和缺点。此外,还需要进一步研究其经济和环境的可持续性,以及可再生资源的利用,以促进其可持续发展和提高其运行效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信