Ureteral injuries management in gynaecologic surgery: the role of the conservative approach

Q3 Medicine
De Cicco Nardone, Ficarola, Feole, De Luca, Plotti, Montera, Luvero, Larciprete, Marci, Angioli, Terranova
{"title":"Ureteral injuries management in gynaecologic surgery: the role of the conservative approach","authors":"De Cicco Nardone, Ficarola, Feole, De Luca, Plotti, Montera, Luvero, Larciprete, Marci, Angioli, Terranova","doi":"10.36129/jog.2023.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective . Ureter is one of the most important landmarks to be taken into consideration during gynaecological surgery. Today, mini-invasive techniques are available to treat ureteral injuries in a more conservative way. This study aims to propose a progressive operative model to manage ureteral injuries by comparing conservative and open approaches. Materials and Methods. This retrospective study analysed 27 injuries in 24 patients admitted for ureteral injuries following gynaecological surgery (in 3 cases, ureteral injuries were bilateral). We obtained data from 16 lacerations, 5 stenosis, and 6 fistulas. Patients in the study were treated with three different techniques for ureteral injuries: cystoscopy with retrograde ureteral stenting, interventional radiology and ureterocystoneostomy. Results. In a retrospective analysis for ureteral lacerations, success rates of the various techniques were: 100% ureterocystoneostomy, 67% Rendezvous, 58% percutaneous nephrostomy plus ureteral stenting, 33% Percutaneous Nephrostomy, 33% cystoscopy with ureteral stenting. Considering ureteral stenosis, success rates were: ureterocystoneostomy 100%, percutaneous nephrostomy plus ureteral stent 33%, Rendezvous, Percutaneous Nephrostomy and cystoscopy with ureteral stent 0%. For ureteral fistula, success rates were ureterocystoneostomy 100%, Rendezvous 100%, percutaneous nephrostomy plus ureteral stent 100%, cystoscopy with ureteral stent 33%, Percutaneous Nephrostomy 0%. Conclusions. According to the obtained results, conservative radiologic procedures represent a valid alternative to open surgery. We propose a progressive operative model: interventional radiology represents an effective approach that could postpone or avoid invasive procedures. Ureterocystoneostomy is the procedure with higher success rates.","PeriodicalId":35717,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36129/jog.2023.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective . Ureter is one of the most important landmarks to be taken into consideration during gynaecological surgery. Today, mini-invasive techniques are available to treat ureteral injuries in a more conservative way. This study aims to propose a progressive operative model to manage ureteral injuries by comparing conservative and open approaches. Materials and Methods. This retrospective study analysed 27 injuries in 24 patients admitted for ureteral injuries following gynaecological surgery (in 3 cases, ureteral injuries were bilateral). We obtained data from 16 lacerations, 5 stenosis, and 6 fistulas. Patients in the study were treated with three different techniques for ureteral injuries: cystoscopy with retrograde ureteral stenting, interventional radiology and ureterocystoneostomy. Results. In a retrospective analysis for ureteral lacerations, success rates of the various techniques were: 100% ureterocystoneostomy, 67% Rendezvous, 58% percutaneous nephrostomy plus ureteral stenting, 33% Percutaneous Nephrostomy, 33% cystoscopy with ureteral stenting. Considering ureteral stenosis, success rates were: ureterocystoneostomy 100%, percutaneous nephrostomy plus ureteral stent 33%, Rendezvous, Percutaneous Nephrostomy and cystoscopy with ureteral stent 0%. For ureteral fistula, success rates were ureterocystoneostomy 100%, Rendezvous 100%, percutaneous nephrostomy plus ureteral stent 100%, cystoscopy with ureteral stent 33%, Percutaneous Nephrostomy 0%. Conclusions. According to the obtained results, conservative radiologic procedures represent a valid alternative to open surgery. We propose a progressive operative model: interventional radiology represents an effective approach that could postpone or avoid invasive procedures. Ureterocystoneostomy is the procedure with higher success rates.
输尿管损伤在妇科手术中的处理:保守入路的作用
目标。输尿管是妇科手术中需要考虑的最重要的标志之一。如今,微创技术可以更保守地治疗输尿管损伤。本研究旨在通过比较保守入路和开放入路,提出一种进行性输尿管损伤手术模式。材料与方法。回顾性分析24例妇科手术后输尿管损伤患者27例损伤(其中3例输尿管双侧损伤)。我们获得了16例撕裂伤、5例狭窄和6例瘘管的数据。研究中的患者采用三种不同的输尿管损伤技术进行治疗:膀胱镜下逆行输尿管支架置入术、介入放射学和输尿管膀胱造口术。结果。在输尿管撕裂伤的回顾性分析中,各种技术的成功率为:输尿管膀胱造瘘100%,会合术67%,经皮肾造瘘加输尿管支架置入58%,经皮肾造瘘33%,输尿管支架置入膀胱镜33%。考虑输尿管狭窄,输尿管膀胱造瘘成功率为100%,经皮肾造瘘+输尿管支架33%,经皮肾造瘘+膀胱镜联合输尿管支架0%。输尿管瘘的成功率为输尿管膀胱造瘘术100%、输尿管会合术100%、经皮肾造瘘术+输尿管支架术100%、膀胱镜+输尿管支架术33%、经皮肾造瘘术0%。结论。根据获得的结果,保守放射治疗是开放手术的有效替代方法。我们提出一种渐进的手术模式:介入放射学是一种有效的方法,可以推迟或避免侵入性手术。输尿管膀胱造口术是成功率较高的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
Italian Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Presentazione: E’ l’organo ufficiale della Società Italiana di Ginecologia e Ostetricia. Con cadenza trimestrale pubblica articoli originali su temi di anatomia, istologia, fisiologia, patologia, genetica e virologia dell’apparato genitale femminile. Propone, inoltre, casi clinici riguardanti valutazioni di tecniche chirurgiche e trattamenti terapeutici; editoriali e review; il punto di vista di eminenti autori su particolari tematiche sotto l’aspetto etico e clinico.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信