Distance-Based Service Priority: An Innovative Mechanism to Increase System Throughput and Social Welfare

Zhongbin Wang, Shiliang Cui, Lei Fang
{"title":"Distance-Based Service Priority: An Innovative Mechanism to Increase System Throughput and Social Welfare","authors":"Zhongbin Wang, Shiliang Cui, Lei Fang","doi":"10.1287/msom.2022.1157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: The main goal of many nonprofit or nongovernmental organizations is to increase the number of customers who receive service (i.e., service coverage) and social welfare. However, the limited number of employees, volunteers, and service locations results in long service wait. In addition, getting customers living in remote areas to receive services by traveling long distances is difficult. We propose an innovative distance-based service priority policy that would reduce the service waiting time for customers who must travel farther for the service by giving them higher service priority, thereby providing them with a new incentive to seek service. Methodology/results: Using a game-theoretic queueing model, we show that the proposed policy can significantly attract more customers to a service. The increase can be up to 50% compared with the ordinary first-come-first-served service discipline. The policy can also achieve higher social welfare, however, that may come at the cost of reduced customer welfare. We therefore propose a possible remedy for a social planner to coordinate welfare under such circumstance. It ensures all stakeholders, including the service provider, customers, and society, can benefit from the policy at the same time. Finally, we compare our distance-based service priority policy with two existing strategies from the literature—namely, the price discrimination strategy and the probabilistic priority strategy. Managerial implications: Our proposed policy can play a pivotal role in a nonprofit service provider’s mission to increase service coverage and social welfare, especially when customers’ travel costs to obtain service are significant. Furthermore, our policy may create fewer implementation and fairness concerns compared with related strategies.","PeriodicalId":18108,"journal":{"name":"Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.","volume":"12 4 1","pages":"353-369"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Problem definition: The main goal of many nonprofit or nongovernmental organizations is to increase the number of customers who receive service (i.e., service coverage) and social welfare. However, the limited number of employees, volunteers, and service locations results in long service wait. In addition, getting customers living in remote areas to receive services by traveling long distances is difficult. We propose an innovative distance-based service priority policy that would reduce the service waiting time for customers who must travel farther for the service by giving them higher service priority, thereby providing them with a new incentive to seek service. Methodology/results: Using a game-theoretic queueing model, we show that the proposed policy can significantly attract more customers to a service. The increase can be up to 50% compared with the ordinary first-come-first-served service discipline. The policy can also achieve higher social welfare, however, that may come at the cost of reduced customer welfare. We therefore propose a possible remedy for a social planner to coordinate welfare under such circumstance. It ensures all stakeholders, including the service provider, customers, and society, can benefit from the policy at the same time. Finally, we compare our distance-based service priority policy with two existing strategies from the literature—namely, the price discrimination strategy and the probabilistic priority strategy. Managerial implications: Our proposed policy can play a pivotal role in a nonprofit service provider’s mission to increase service coverage and social welfare, especially when customers’ travel costs to obtain service are significant. Furthermore, our policy may create fewer implementation and fairness concerns compared with related strategies.
基于距离的服务优先:一种提高系统吞吐量和社会福利的创新机制
问题定义:许多非营利组织或非政府组织的主要目标是增加接受服务的客户数量(即服务覆盖率)和社会福利。然而,有限的员工、志愿者和服务地点导致了漫长的服务等待。此外,让生活在偏远地区的客户长途跋涉接受服务也很困难。我们提出了一种创新的基于距离的服务优先政策,通过给予客户更高的服务优先级,减少那些必须走得更远的客户的服务等待时间,从而为他们提供新的寻求服务的动力。方法/结果:利用博弈论的排队模型,我们证明了所提出的策略可以显著地吸引更多的顾客。与普通的先到先得服务相比,涨幅可达50%。该政策也可以实现更高的社会福利,然而,这可能是以降低客户福利为代价的。因此,我们提出了一种可能的补救办法,即社会计划者在这种情况下协调福利。它确保所有利益相关者,包括服务提供者、客户和社会,都能同时从政策中受益。最后,我们将基于距离的服务优先策略与文献中已有的两种策略(即价格歧视策略和概率优先策略)进行了比较。管理意义:我们提出的政策可以在非营利服务提供商的使命中发挥关键作用,以增加服务覆盖范围和社会福利,特别是当客户获得服务的旅行成本很高时。此外,与相关策略相比,我们的政策可能会产生更少的执行和公平问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信