The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk by Samuel McCormick (review)

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
D. Gross
{"title":"The Chattering Mind: A Conceptual History of Everyday Talk by Samuel McCormick (review)","authors":"D. Gross","doi":"10.1353/rht.2023.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"thorubos of the audience. At page 103, the author seems to overlook the fact that “focus[ing] on the integrative and cohesive side” of a myth in a funeral oration was not incompatible with concealing divisions in the citizen body but could in fact be a method of actively doing so. Perhaps the book’s most valuable contribution is its sustained rhetorical analysis of the four chosen myths across different genres and institutional settings. Barbato’s discussion of Euripides’ Children of Heracles (126–133), and particularly his consideration of its use and subversion of language and themes from oratory and politics, is compelling. The readings of Lysias’ funeral oration throughout are a necessary addition to the scholarship on the speech; particularly interesting is the discussion on the Amazons and hybris in Lysias. The chapter on the Amazonomachy contains, however, the description of victims of sexual abuse and abduction by Theseus as his “love interests” (172), which was disappointing in an otherwise fairly sensitive treatment of the subject. Barbato’s book will be a valuable addition to the library of anyone studying Athenian ideology and democracy or the rhetoric of mythology.","PeriodicalId":40200,"journal":{"name":"Res Rhetorica","volume":"72 1","pages":"90 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res Rhetorica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rht.2023.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

thorubos of the audience. At page 103, the author seems to overlook the fact that “focus[ing] on the integrative and cohesive side” of a myth in a funeral oration was not incompatible with concealing divisions in the citizen body but could in fact be a method of actively doing so. Perhaps the book’s most valuable contribution is its sustained rhetorical analysis of the four chosen myths across different genres and institutional settings. Barbato’s discussion of Euripides’ Children of Heracles (126–133), and particularly his consideration of its use and subversion of language and themes from oratory and politics, is compelling. The readings of Lysias’ funeral oration throughout are a necessary addition to the scholarship on the speech; particularly interesting is the discussion on the Amazons and hybris in Lysias. The chapter on the Amazonomachy contains, however, the description of victims of sexual abuse and abduction by Theseus as his “love interests” (172), which was disappointing in an otherwise fairly sensitive treatment of the subject. Barbato’s book will be a valuable addition to the library of anyone studying Athenian ideology and democracy or the rhetoric of mythology.
喋喋不休的心灵:日常谈话的概念史塞缪尔·麦考密克(书评)
观众中的索罗波斯。在第103页,作者似乎忽略了这样一个事实,即在葬礼演说中“关注神话的整体性和凝聚力方面”与隐藏公民身体的分裂并不矛盾,但实际上可能是积极做到这一点的一种方法。也许这本书最有价值的贡献是它对四个选定的神话在不同体裁和制度背景下的持续修辞分析。巴巴托对欧里庇得斯的《赫拉克勒斯的孩子们》(126-133)的讨论,特别是他对演讲和政治中语言和主题的使用和颠覆的考虑,令人信服。阅读吕西亚斯的葬礼演说全文是对演讲学术研究的必要补充;特别有趣的是《吕西亚斯》中关于亚马逊女战士和混血儿的讨论。然而,在关于亚马逊的章节中,忒修斯把性虐待和绑架的受害者描述为他的“爱的对象”(172),这在对这个主题相当敏感的处理中是令人失望的。对于研究雅典意识形态和民主或神话修辞的人来说,巴巴托的书将是图书馆中宝贵的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Res Rhetorica
Res Rhetorica HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信