Model of Religious Moderation In Universities: Alternative Solutions To Liberal, Literal And Radical Islam

M. Parhan, Risris Hari Nugraha, Mohammad Rindu Fajar Islamy
{"title":"Model of Religious Moderation In Universities: Alternative Solutions To Liberal, Literal And Radical Islam","authors":"M. Parhan, Risris Hari Nugraha, Mohammad Rindu Fajar Islamy","doi":"10.28918/jei.v7i1.5218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to offer a model for implementing religious moderation learning in higher education to stem contradictory ideologies with Islamic teachings such as liberalism, literalism, and radicalism. Their existence has recently significantly disrupted the stability of religious harmony in Indonesia. The current reality of extreme and exclusive religion is spreading in the academic world. Students who only use rational logic without religious texts will be trapped in radical logical reasoning, so they tend to be liberal. On the other hand, students who only adhere to religious texts without being accompanied by critical logic will be dogmatic in understanding religious texts literally. The existence of an understanding of Islam with two camps of liberal and literal interpretation is not in line with a moderation in religion which will obscure the actual value of Islamic teachings. This ideology will produce radical religious perspectives, attitudes, and behaviors. The research approach is research and development, which collaborates quantitative and qualitative. Methods of collecting data through interviews, observation, questionnaires, and documentation. The selection of respondents and informants through random sampling technique, while data analysis using the Miles and Huberman approach.","PeriodicalId":52905,"journal":{"name":"Edukasia Islamika Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","volume":"173 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edukasia Islamika Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28918/jei.v7i1.5218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study aims to offer a model for implementing religious moderation learning in higher education to stem contradictory ideologies with Islamic teachings such as liberalism, literalism, and radicalism. Their existence has recently significantly disrupted the stability of religious harmony in Indonesia. The current reality of extreme and exclusive religion is spreading in the academic world. Students who only use rational logic without religious texts will be trapped in radical logical reasoning, so they tend to be liberal. On the other hand, students who only adhere to religious texts without being accompanied by critical logic will be dogmatic in understanding religious texts literally. The existence of an understanding of Islam with two camps of liberal and literal interpretation is not in line with a moderation in religion which will obscure the actual value of Islamic teachings. This ideology will produce radical religious perspectives, attitudes, and behaviors. The research approach is research and development, which collaborates quantitative and qualitative. Methods of collecting data through interviews, observation, questionnaires, and documentation. The selection of respondents and informants through random sampling technique, while data analysis using the Miles and Huberman approach.
大学里的宗教节制模式:自由主义、文字主义和激进伊斯兰的替代解决方案
本研究旨在提供一种在高等教育中实施宗教节制学习的模式,以遏止自由主义、字面主义、激进主义等与伊斯兰教义相矛盾的意识形态。他们的存在最近严重破坏了印度尼西亚宗教和谐的稳定。宗教极端、排他性的现实正在学术界蔓延。只使用理性逻辑而不使用宗教文本的学生,会陷入激进的逻辑推理,因而倾向于自由主义。另一方面,如果学生只坚持宗教文本,而没有批判性逻辑的陪伴,那么在字面上理解宗教文本就会变得教条。把对伊斯兰教的理解分为自由主义和字面解释两大阵营,这与宗教的温和是不一致的,因为它会模糊伊斯兰教义的实际价值。这种意识形态会产生激进的宗教观点、态度和行为。研究方法是研究与开发,定量与定性相结合。通过访谈、观察、问卷调查和文件收集数据的方法。受访者和举报人的选择通过随机抽样技术,而数据分析使用迈尔斯和休伯曼的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信