{"title":"“Please don't be too nice”: the role of political ideology in the approval of police use of force","authors":"John C. Navarro, Michael A. Hansen","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-03-2023-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore the ideological gaps on police use of force.Design/methodology/approachIn a national-level survey distributed via Mechanical Turk (MTurk) (n = 979), the authors explore the role that respondents' political ideology plays in the approval of police use of force across a range of scenarios.FindingsAcross all scenarios, self-identified conservative respondents maintain strong approval of police use of force. In comparison, liberal respondents provide more variance in their views on approval of police use of force based on the scenario. The scenarios where there are small gaps in approval between the two ideologies are when reasonable force is used toward a violent threat.Social implicationsThere are specific circumstances where the messaging surrounding use of force can create agreement (reasonable) or disagreement (excessive) among conservatives and liberals.Originality/valueConservatives and liberals demonstrate gaps across an even larger set of use of force scenarios.","PeriodicalId":47881,"journal":{"name":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-03-2023-0035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore the ideological gaps on police use of force.Design/methodology/approachIn a national-level survey distributed via Mechanical Turk (MTurk) (n = 979), the authors explore the role that respondents' political ideology plays in the approval of police use of force across a range of scenarios.FindingsAcross all scenarios, self-identified conservative respondents maintain strong approval of police use of force. In comparison, liberal respondents provide more variance in their views on approval of police use of force based on the scenario. The scenarios where there are small gaps in approval between the two ideologies are when reasonable force is used toward a violent threat.Social implicationsThere are specific circumstances where the messaging surrounding use of force can create agreement (reasonable) or disagreement (excessive) among conservatives and liberals.Originality/valueConservatives and liberals demonstrate gaps across an even larger set of use of force scenarios.
目的探讨警察使用武力的意识形态差异。通过Mechanical Turk (MTurk)进行的一项全国性调查(n = 979)中,作者探讨了受访者的政治意识形态在一系列场景中对警察使用武力的认可中所起的作用。在所有情况下,自我认定为保守派的受访者都强烈支持警察使用武力。相比之下,自由派受访者在支持警察使用武力的观点上,则根据不同的情景表现出更大的差异。两种意识形态之间存在小差距的情况是,对暴力威胁使用合理的武力。社会影响在某些特定的情况下,围绕使用武力的信息可以在保守派和自由派之间产生一致(合理)或分歧(过度)。原创性/价值保守主义者和自由主义者在更大范围的武力使用场景中表现出差距。