Active and super active oxygen on metals in comparison with metal oxides

G. Panov, E. Starokon, D. Ivanov, L. Pirutko, A. S. Kharitonov
{"title":"Active and super active oxygen on metals in comparison with metal oxides","authors":"G. Panov, E. Starokon, D. Ivanov, L. Pirutko, A. S. Kharitonov","doi":"10.1080/01614940.2020.1778389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the context of heterogeneous catalysis, oxygen on metals and oxygen on metal oxides are often considered as two different phenomena that are little related to each other. The former is mainly investigated in the field of Surface Science and the calculation chemistry, while the latter in the field of conventional catalysis. In this review we performed a joint analysis of the literature data obtained in both fields, which showed that in many aspects these two types of oxygen are chemically similar. It is usually assumed that, as in the case of oxides, the reactivity of oxygen on metals is determined by its binding energy to the surface. Trying to confirm this idea by comparing the catalytic activity of metals with the heat of oxygen adsorption (QO2), we came across a paradox of excessive metal activity, which was associated with the presence of “hot” or super active (SA) oxygen. This oxygen is capable of oxidizing methane and other substances at cryogenic temperatures but does not make a significant contribution to QO2. A comparison of SA oxygen on metals with the O•– radicals on oxides revealed a clear similarity of these species. This allows one to conclude that the oxygen on metals is a radical, which well explains its super high reactivity without using the idea of an energetically excited state. A hypothesis is proposed that not only O•–, but also the surface O2- species have a certain degree of the radical nature. Results of low-temperature reactions of SA oxygen offer a more precise interpretation of the selectivity rule. Not the high or low reactivity of surface oxygen in itself is essential for the selective catalyst. A consent between the rates of the product formation and its desorption from the surface is of vital importance. This concept opens the possibility for new approaches in the development of selective catalysts, including those based on metals.","PeriodicalId":9647,"journal":{"name":"Catalysis Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalysis Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2020.1778389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the context of heterogeneous catalysis, oxygen on metals and oxygen on metal oxides are often considered as two different phenomena that are little related to each other. The former is mainly investigated in the field of Surface Science and the calculation chemistry, while the latter in the field of conventional catalysis. In this review we performed a joint analysis of the literature data obtained in both fields, which showed that in many aspects these two types of oxygen are chemically similar. It is usually assumed that, as in the case of oxides, the reactivity of oxygen on metals is determined by its binding energy to the surface. Trying to confirm this idea by comparing the catalytic activity of metals with the heat of oxygen adsorption (QO2), we came across a paradox of excessive metal activity, which was associated with the presence of “hot” or super active (SA) oxygen. This oxygen is capable of oxidizing methane and other substances at cryogenic temperatures but does not make a significant contribution to QO2. A comparison of SA oxygen on metals with the O•– radicals on oxides revealed a clear similarity of these species. This allows one to conclude that the oxygen on metals is a radical, which well explains its super high reactivity without using the idea of an energetically excited state. A hypothesis is proposed that not only O•–, but also the surface O2- species have a certain degree of the radical nature. Results of low-temperature reactions of SA oxygen offer a more precise interpretation of the selectivity rule. Not the high or low reactivity of surface oxygen in itself is essential for the selective catalyst. A consent between the rates of the product formation and its desorption from the surface is of vital importance. This concept opens the possibility for new approaches in the development of selective catalysts, including those based on metals.
金属上的活性氧和超活性氧与金属氧化物的比较
在多相催化中,氧在金属上的作用和氧在金属氧化物上的作用通常被认为是两种不同的现象,彼此之间的关系不大。前者主要在表面科学和计算化学领域进行研究,后者主要在常规催化领域进行研究。在这篇综述中,我们对这两个领域获得的文献数据进行了联合分析,结果表明,在许多方面,这两种氧在化学上是相似的。通常认为,与氧化物的情况一样,氧在金属上的反应性是由它与金属表面的结合能决定的。试图通过比较金属的催化活性与氧吸附热(QO2)来证实这一观点,我们遇到了金属活性过高的悖论,这与“热”或超活性(SA)氧的存在有关。这种氧能够在低温下氧化甲烷和其他物质,但对QO2的贡献不大。金属上的SA氧与氧化物上的O•自由基的比较显示了这两个物种的明显相似性。这使得人们可以得出结论,金属上的氧是一种自由基,这很好地解释了它的超高反应性,而无需使用能量激发态的概念。提出了一种假设,即不仅O•-具有一定程度的自由基性质,表面的O2-也具有一定程度的自由基性质。SA氧低温反应的结果对选择性规律提供了更精确的解释。不是表面氧本身的高或低的反应活性对选择性催化剂是必要的。产物形成速率和表面解吸速率之间的一致性是至关重要的。这一概念为开发选择性催化剂(包括基于金属的催化剂)开辟了新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信