{"title":"Research misconduct: how bad is it and what can be done?","authors":"Steve Chaplin MSc, MRPharmS","doi":"10.1002/fps.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We make two important assumptions when appraising the evidence behind an intervention: that the data are genuine and that they represent the total body of relevant knowledge. Doubts have been growing about both. Research misconduct and selective reporting of clinical trials are undermining confidence in scientific data, and the response of the research establishment has been mixed. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100566,"journal":{"name":"Future Prescriber","volume":"13 1","pages":"5-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/fps.88","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Prescriber","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fps.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
We make two important assumptions when appraising the evidence behind an intervention: that the data are genuine and that they represent the total body of relevant knowledge. Doubts have been growing about both. Research misconduct and selective reporting of clinical trials are undermining confidence in scientific data, and the response of the research establishment has been mixed. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
科研不端行为:有多严重?可以做些什么?
在评估干预措施背后的证据时，我们做了两个重要的假设:数据是真实的，它们代表了相关知识的总体。对这两方面的质疑都在增加。研究不端行为和对临床试验的选择性报告正在破坏人们对科学数据的信心，研究机构对此的反应褒贬不一。版权所有©2012 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
