A mixed cycle for converting heat to mechanical work

V.E. Styliaras
{"title":"A mixed cycle for converting heat to mechanical work","authors":"V.E. Styliaras","doi":"10.1016/0890-4332(94)00083-W","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The subject of this study is to compare two different methods of converting heat to mechanical work. The first one is the well known Rankine cycle, which uses a pure substance as the working fluid. The second one is a power cycle which uses a mixture of substances with different boiling points as the working fluid. For convenience, this cycle will be called the mixed cycle hereafter.</p><p>Since the conventional Rankine cycle has been analyzed by many other authors, we will focus on the mixed cycle. The main difference between the two is that, in the mixed cycle, steam is released by heating a mixture. The initial working fluid is created as the expanded steam is absorbed by a mixture of lower concentration at lower temperature and pressure.</p><p>The main disadvantages of the mixed cycle are the upper temperature limit and the larger mass circulation.</p><p>In order to illustrate the “efficiency limits” of the mixed cycle, a theoretical analysis is presented, in which all processes are considered to be ideal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100603,"journal":{"name":"Heat Recovery Systems and CHP","volume":"15 8","pages":"Pages 749-753"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0890-4332(94)00083-W","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Recovery Systems and CHP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/089043329400083W","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The subject of this study is to compare two different methods of converting heat to mechanical work. The first one is the well known Rankine cycle, which uses a pure substance as the working fluid. The second one is a power cycle which uses a mixture of substances with different boiling points as the working fluid. For convenience, this cycle will be called the mixed cycle hereafter.

Since the conventional Rankine cycle has been analyzed by many other authors, we will focus on the mixed cycle. The main difference between the two is that, in the mixed cycle, steam is released by heating a mixture. The initial working fluid is created as the expanded steam is absorbed by a mixture of lower concentration at lower temperature and pressure.

The main disadvantages of the mixed cycle are the upper temperature limit and the larger mass circulation.

In order to illustrate the “efficiency limits” of the mixed cycle, a theoretical analysis is presented, in which all processes are considered to be ideal.

将热转化为机械功的混合循环
本研究的主题是比较两种将热转化为机械功的不同方法。第一种是众所周知的朗肯循环,它使用一种纯物质作为工作流体。第二种是动力循环,它使用具有不同沸点的物质的混合物作为工作流体。为方便起见,下文将此循环称为混合循环。由于许多其他作者已经分析了传统的朗肯循环,因此我们将重点讨论混合循环。两者的主要区别在于,在混合循环中,蒸汽是通过加热混合物来释放的。当膨胀的蒸汽在较低温度和较低压力下被较低浓度的混合物吸收时,产生初始工作流体。混合循环的主要缺点是温度上限和较大的质量循环。为了说明混合循环的“效率极限”,提出了一个理论分析,其中所有过程都被认为是理想的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信