Making a diagnosis of glaucoma at the present time

Q4 Medicine
A. Movsisyan, A. Kuroyedov
{"title":"Making a diagnosis of glaucoma at the present time","authors":"A. Movsisyan, A. Kuroyedov","doi":"10.32364/2311-7729-2023-23-1-47-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thus far, practicing physicians perform glaucoma screening based on Graefe’s triad of symptoms. Considering the predicted increase in glaucoma incidence and the current trend in diagnosis verification at the time when patients already demonstrate significant changes in visual function, the issue on the need to revise these \"markers\" is raised. Summarizing the available modern diagnostic capabilities for glaucoma screening, it is fair to say that nowadays none of the diagnostic methods can \"work alone\". Only monitoring of glaucoma patients will help to determine accurately the presence or absence of glaucoma changes. Thus, the current standard for glaucoma detection includes several diagnostic methods. To receive reliable data on the disease prevalence, its diagnosis should be established in a timely manner. However, there are still difficulties faced in diagnosing glaucoma. This problem can be solved through the improvement of the available diagnostic tools and/or the introduction of novel methods of patient assessment. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, capable of learning and conducting in-depth analysis, has enabled the development of this approach. At the same time, the question of optimizing its application for practical medicine remains open. Keywords: primary open-angle glaucoma, glaucoma screening, glaucoma diagnosing, neural networks. For citation: Movsisyan A.B., Kuroyedov A.V. Making a diagnosis of glaucoma at the present time. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2023;23(1):47–53 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2023-23-1-47-53.","PeriodicalId":36455,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-2023-23-1-47-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Thus far, practicing physicians perform glaucoma screening based on Graefe’s triad of symptoms. Considering the predicted increase in glaucoma incidence and the current trend in diagnosis verification at the time when patients already demonstrate significant changes in visual function, the issue on the need to revise these "markers" is raised. Summarizing the available modern diagnostic capabilities for glaucoma screening, it is fair to say that nowadays none of the diagnostic methods can "work alone". Only monitoring of glaucoma patients will help to determine accurately the presence or absence of glaucoma changes. Thus, the current standard for glaucoma detection includes several diagnostic methods. To receive reliable data on the disease prevalence, its diagnosis should be established in a timely manner. However, there are still difficulties faced in diagnosing glaucoma. This problem can be solved through the improvement of the available diagnostic tools and/or the introduction of novel methods of patient assessment. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, capable of learning and conducting in-depth analysis, has enabled the development of this approach. At the same time, the question of optimizing its application for practical medicine remains open. Keywords: primary open-angle glaucoma, glaucoma screening, glaucoma diagnosing, neural networks. For citation: Movsisyan A.B., Kuroyedov A.V. Making a diagnosis of glaucoma at the present time. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2023;23(1):47–53 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2023-23-1-47-53.
目前诊断为青光眼
到目前为止,执业医师进行青光眼筛查是基于Graefe的三联征。考虑到青光眼发病率的预测增加,以及目前在患者已经表现出明显的视觉功能变化时诊断验证的趋势,提出了是否需要修改这些“标记”的问题。总结现有的青光眼筛查的现代诊断能力,公平地说,目前没有一种诊断方法可以“单独工作”。只有对青光眼患者进行监测,才能准确判断青光眼病变的存在与否。因此,目前的青光眼检测标准包括几种诊断方法。为了获得有关该病流行情况的可靠数据,应及时作出诊断。然而,青光眼的诊断仍然存在困难。这个问题可以通过改进现有的诊断工具和/或引入新的病人评估方法来解决。能够学习并进行深入分析的人工智能(AI)技术的出现,使这种方法得以发展。与此同时,优化其在实际医学中的应用仍然是一个开放的问题。关键词:原发性开角型青光眼,青光眼筛查,青光眼诊断,神经网络引文:Movsisyan a.b., Kuroyedov A.V.,目前诊断青光眼。俄罗斯临床眼科学杂志,2023;23(1):47-53。DOI: 10.32364 / 2311-7729-2023-23-1-47-53。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信