Genetically Epilepsy‐Prone Rats (GEPRs) in Drug Research

P. Jobe, J. Dailey
{"title":"Genetically Epilepsy‐Prone Rats (GEPRs) in Drug Research","authors":"P. Jobe, J. Dailey","doi":"10.1111/J.1527-3458.2000.TB00150.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two independently derived, inbred strains of genetically epilepsy-prone rats (GEPRs) have been developed, the moderately epileptic GEPR-3 and the more severely epileptic GEPR-9. Seizures expressed by GEPRs model human generalized tonic/clonic seizures (GTCSs) and partial seizures secondarily generalized to tonic/clonic seizures. Several types of existing antiepileptic drugs have been tested in the GEPR model. Without exception, the seizure suppressing properties of these drugs occur both in GEPR-3 s and GEPR-9s. The differential responses of the two GEPR strains separate the antiepileptic drugs into three categories: (1) those effective in GTCSs and partial seizures; (2) those that are additionally effective in absence seizures; and (3) those effective in absence seizures but not in convulsive seizures. No known false positives have yet been detected in GEPR tests. In addition to the utility of the seizures expressed by GEPRs in drug development paradigms, these animals also have potential in the search for drugs that are specifically “antiseizure predisposition” rather than merely anticonvulsant. Heretofore, worldwide drug development efforts have emphasized the discovery of drugs that are anticonvulsant in nonepileptic animals. As might have been anticipated, these same drugs have proven to be anticonvulsant in epileptic subjects. Paradigms that would detect drugs with the capacity to correct the biological determinants of predisposition are in early stages of application. Kindling seizures provide a means to identify drugs that might be useful in correcting stimulus-induced seizure predisposition. The GEPR and other genetic models of the epilepsies provide models for developing treatments to correct genetically determined seizure predisposition. Emerging evidence supports the hypothesis that GEPRs model comorbidity between the epilepsies and affective disorders. Understanding the basis of this comorbidity has the potential to enable the development of treatments that reverse the underlying abnormalities of the coexisting disorders. Because human epilepsies and affective disorders are environmentally and genetically complex, the abnormalities of the GEPR probably will not account for all predispositions leading to this comorbidity.","PeriodicalId":10499,"journal":{"name":"CNS drug reviews","volume":"147 3 1","pages":"241-260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS drug reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1527-3458.2000.TB00150.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Two independently derived, inbred strains of genetically epilepsy-prone rats (GEPRs) have been developed, the moderately epileptic GEPR-3 and the more severely epileptic GEPR-9. Seizures expressed by GEPRs model human generalized tonic/clonic seizures (GTCSs) and partial seizures secondarily generalized to tonic/clonic seizures. Several types of existing antiepileptic drugs have been tested in the GEPR model. Without exception, the seizure suppressing properties of these drugs occur both in GEPR-3 s and GEPR-9s. The differential responses of the two GEPR strains separate the antiepileptic drugs into three categories: (1) those effective in GTCSs and partial seizures; (2) those that are additionally effective in absence seizures; and (3) those effective in absence seizures but not in convulsive seizures. No known false positives have yet been detected in GEPR tests. In addition to the utility of the seizures expressed by GEPRs in drug development paradigms, these animals also have potential in the search for drugs that are specifically “antiseizure predisposition” rather than merely anticonvulsant. Heretofore, worldwide drug development efforts have emphasized the discovery of drugs that are anticonvulsant in nonepileptic animals. As might have been anticipated, these same drugs have proven to be anticonvulsant in epileptic subjects. Paradigms that would detect drugs with the capacity to correct the biological determinants of predisposition are in early stages of application. Kindling seizures provide a means to identify drugs that might be useful in correcting stimulus-induced seizure predisposition. The GEPR and other genetic models of the epilepsies provide models for developing treatments to correct genetically determined seizure predisposition. Emerging evidence supports the hypothesis that GEPRs model comorbidity between the epilepsies and affective disorders. Understanding the basis of this comorbidity has the potential to enable the development of treatments that reverse the underlying abnormalities of the coexisting disorders. Because human epilepsies and affective disorders are environmentally and genetically complex, the abnormalities of the GEPR probably will not account for all predispositions leading to this comorbidity.
药物研究中的遗传性癫痫易感大鼠(gepr
两种独立衍生的近交遗传癫痫易感大鼠(gepr)已被开发,中度癫痫大鼠GEPR-3和更严重的癫痫大鼠GEPR-9。由GEPRs模型表达的癫痫发作:人类全身性强直性/阵挛性发作(GTCSs)和继发于强直性/阵挛性发作的部分性发作。几种现有的抗癫痫药物已经在GEPR模型中进行了测试。毫无例外,这些药物在GEPR-3 s和GEPR-9s中都具有抑制癫痫发作的特性。两种GEPR菌株的差异反应将抗癫痫药物分为三类:(1)对gtcs和部分性癫痫发作有效;(二)对失神发作另有效力的;(3)对失神发作有效而对惊厥发作无效的。在GEPR测试中尚未发现已知的假阳性。除了在药物开发范例中利用gepr表达的癫痫发作外,这些动物在寻找特异性“抗癫痫易感性”而不仅仅是抗惊厥药物方面也有潜力。到目前为止,世界范围内的药物开发工作都强调在非癫痫动物中发现抗惊厥药物。正如所预料的那样,这些药物已被证明对癫痫患者具有抗惊厥作用。检测具有纠正易感性的生物学决定因素能力的药物的范例正处于应用的早期阶段。点燃癫痫发作提供了一种识别药物的方法,这种药物可能有助于纠正刺激诱发的癫痫发作倾向。GEPR和其他癫痫的遗传模型为开发治疗方法提供了模型,以纠正由遗传决定的癫痫易感性。新出现的证据支持gepr模型癫痫和情感性障碍之间共病的假设。了解这种共病的基础有可能使治疗的发展逆转共存疾病的潜在异常。由于人类癫痫和情感性障碍是环境和基因复杂的,GEPR的异常可能不能解释导致这种合并症的所有易感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信