A Low-Complexity Flexible Logic-Locking Scheme Resisting Removal Attacks

Jingbo Zhou, Xinmiao Zhang
{"title":"A Low-Complexity Flexible Logic-Locking Scheme Resisting Removal Attacks","authors":"Jingbo Zhou, Xinmiao Zhang","doi":"10.1109/MWSCAS47672.2021.9531796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Logic locking is necessary for protecting intellectual property. Although logic-locking schemes have been proposed to resist the powerful satisfiability (SAT)-based attack, many of them are subject to removal attacks, which identify the logic- locking block and replace its output by the correct signal, so the circuit would function correctly without the right key. In order to prevent removal attacks, the stripped functional logic locking-Hamming distance (SFLL-HD) scheme and its variations corrupt the original circuit and add a logic-locking block to correct the errors. The high-complexity HD checker can be also replaced by the Cascaded(CAS)-lock block. This paper proposes a new low-complexity logic-locking scheme inspired by the Generalized(G)-Anti-SAT block. By relaxing the constraint of the G-Anti-SAT design in the SFLL setting, our new logic-locking scheme reduces the logic complexity by around 37% compared to the M-CAS block with similar resistance to the SAT and removal attacks. Additionally, unlike the SFLL-HD and Mirrored (M)- CAS schemes, the proposed logic-locking block can use a large variation of functions. This makes existing or potential attacks utilizing properties of the logic function impossible.","PeriodicalId":6792,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"869-873"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSCAS47672.2021.9531796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Logic locking is necessary for protecting intellectual property. Although logic-locking schemes have been proposed to resist the powerful satisfiability (SAT)-based attack, many of them are subject to removal attacks, which identify the logic- locking block and replace its output by the correct signal, so the circuit would function correctly without the right key. In order to prevent removal attacks, the stripped functional logic locking-Hamming distance (SFLL-HD) scheme and its variations corrupt the original circuit and add a logic-locking block to correct the errors. The high-complexity HD checker can be also replaced by the Cascaded(CAS)-lock block. This paper proposes a new low-complexity logic-locking scheme inspired by the Generalized(G)-Anti-SAT block. By relaxing the constraint of the G-Anti-SAT design in the SFLL setting, our new logic-locking scheme reduces the logic complexity by around 37% compared to the M-CAS block with similar resistance to the SAT and removal attacks. Additionally, unlike the SFLL-HD and Mirrored (M)- CAS schemes, the proposed logic-locking block can use a large variation of functions. This makes existing or potential attacks utilizing properties of the logic function impossible.
一种抗移除攻击的低复杂度灵活逻辑锁定方案
逻辑锁定是保护知识产权的必要手段。尽管已经提出了一些逻辑锁定方案来抵御基于满足性(SAT)的强大攻击,但其中许多方案都容易受到移除攻击的影响,移除攻击会识别出逻辑锁定块,并用正确的信号替换其输出,从而使电路在没有正确密钥的情况下也能正常工作。为了防止移除攻击,剥离功能逻辑锁定-汉明距离(SFLL-HD)方案及其变体破坏了原始电路,并增加了逻辑锁定块来纠正错误。高复杂性的HD检查器也可以被级联(CAS)锁块取代。本文从广义(G)-Anti-SAT块的启发出发,提出了一种新的低复杂度逻辑锁定方案。通过放宽G-Anti-SAT设计在SFLL设置中的约束,我们的新逻辑锁定方案与具有类似SAT和移除攻击抵抗力的M-CAS块相比,将逻辑复杂性降低了约37%。此外,与SFLL-HD和镜像(M)- CAS方案不同,所提出的逻辑锁定块可以使用大量不同的函数。这使得利用逻辑函数属性的现有或潜在攻击变得不可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信