Respiratory muscles power reversibility test as a new test in asthma diagnosis

O. Abdalla, O. Musa
{"title":"Respiratory muscles power reversibility test as a new test in asthma diagnosis","authors":"O. Abdalla, O. Musa","doi":"10.15406/jlprr.2019.03.00211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making diagnosis of asthma requires a critical evaluation of the patient’s symptoms, medical history, physical examination and diagnostic tests. It is known that a reduction of respiratory muscle pressures (MIP and MEP) for assessment of respiratory muscles power has been associated with several neuromuscular diseases, but it is also possible to point out lower values in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases as in asthma. As asthma diagnosis by reversibility test is not very sensitive in intermittent and mild asthma and pulmonary function is related to respiratory muscle pressures (RMP), could we use the reversibility of RMP in the patients for asthma diagnosis is the main issue investigated in this research. The aim of the study to determine the validity of asthma diagnosis by reversibility testing of respiratory muscles power. A cross-sectional hospital based study carried out in Lung function tests clinic in Police and Alban Gadeed hospitals in Khartoum during the years 2010-2011 to determine the reversibility of the lung function (FEV1 and PEFR) and respiratory muscles power (MEP and MIP). Thirty five known asthmatic subjects attending the referred chest clinic for follow up, and 20 healthy non asthmatic controls were included in the study. FEV1, PEFR, MEP and MIP were measured for all subjects before and after bronchodilator. Reversibility test was considered positive assuming the cut-off point for FEV1, MEP and MIP is ≥12% and for PEFR≥20%.The results showed percent of change in asthmatic group before and after bronchodilator test for FEV1 , PEFR, MEP, MIP were: 10.45, 11.84, 12.15 and 16.73 respectively. The difference was statistically significant. Sensitivity and specificity of reversibility testing for FEV1 (40%, 75%), for PEFR (31%, 65%), for MEP (49%, 70%) and for MIP (71%, 65%). In conclusion, the respiratory muscles power reversibility test could be a potentially sensitive diagnostic test for asthma","PeriodicalId":91750,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lung, pulmonary & respiratory research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lung, pulmonary & respiratory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jlprr.2019.03.00211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Making diagnosis of asthma requires a critical evaluation of the patient’s symptoms, medical history, physical examination and diagnostic tests. It is known that a reduction of respiratory muscle pressures (MIP and MEP) for assessment of respiratory muscles power has been associated with several neuromuscular diseases, but it is also possible to point out lower values in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases as in asthma. As asthma diagnosis by reversibility test is not very sensitive in intermittent and mild asthma and pulmonary function is related to respiratory muscle pressures (RMP), could we use the reversibility of RMP in the patients for asthma diagnosis is the main issue investigated in this research. The aim of the study to determine the validity of asthma diagnosis by reversibility testing of respiratory muscles power. A cross-sectional hospital based study carried out in Lung function tests clinic in Police and Alban Gadeed hospitals in Khartoum during the years 2010-2011 to determine the reversibility of the lung function (FEV1 and PEFR) and respiratory muscles power (MEP and MIP). Thirty five known asthmatic subjects attending the referred chest clinic for follow up, and 20 healthy non asthmatic controls were included in the study. FEV1, PEFR, MEP and MIP were measured for all subjects before and after bronchodilator. Reversibility test was considered positive assuming the cut-off point for FEV1, MEP and MIP is ≥12% and for PEFR≥20%.The results showed percent of change in asthmatic group before and after bronchodilator test for FEV1 , PEFR, MEP, MIP were: 10.45, 11.84, 12.15 and 16.73 respectively. The difference was statistically significant. Sensitivity and specificity of reversibility testing for FEV1 (40%, 75%), for PEFR (31%, 65%), for MEP (49%, 70%) and for MIP (71%, 65%). In conclusion, the respiratory muscles power reversibility test could be a potentially sensitive diagnostic test for asthma
呼吸肌力可逆性试验作为哮喘诊断的新方法
诊断哮喘需要对患者的症状、病史、体格检查和诊断测试进行严格的评估。众所周知,用于评估呼吸肌力量的呼吸肌压力(MIP和MEP)的降低与几种神经肌肉疾病有关,但也可能指出慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的数值较低,如哮喘患者。由于间断性哮喘和轻度哮喘的可逆性检测诊断并不十分敏感,而肺功能又与呼吸肌压(RMP)有关,能否将患者的RMP可逆性用于哮喘诊断是本研究探讨的主要问题。本研究的目的是通过呼吸肌力的可逆性测试来确定哮喘诊断的有效性。2010-2011年期间,在喀土穆警察医院和阿尔班加迪德医院肺功能测试诊所进行了一项基于医院的横断面研究,以确定肺功能(FEV1和PEFR)和呼吸肌力量(MEP和MIP)的可逆性。本研究包括35名到胸科诊所接受随访的已知哮喘患者,以及20名健康的非哮喘对照者。测量所有受试者使用支气管扩张剂前后的FEV1、PEFR、MEP和MIP。假设FEV1、MEP和MIP的分界点≥12%,PEFR≥20%,则认为可逆性检验为阳性。结果显示,哮喘组FEV1、PEFR、MEP、MIP在支气管扩张剂试验前后的变化率分别为:10.45%、11.84%、12.15%、16.73%。差异有统计学意义。FEV1、PEFR(31%、65%)、MEP(49%、70%)和MIP(71%、65%)可逆性检测的敏感性和特异性分别为40%和75%。总之,呼吸肌力可逆性试验是一种潜在的敏感的哮喘诊断试验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信