Using caregivers-as-proxies to retrospectively assess and measure quality of dying of palliative care clients

M. Bridge, D. Roughton, S. Lewis, J. Barelds, S. Brenton, Sherree Cotter, Mary-lou Hagebols, Kirsty Woolman, M. Annells, T. Koch
{"title":"Using caregivers-as-proxies to retrospectively assess and measure quality of dying of palliative care clients","authors":"M. Bridge, D. Roughton, S. Lewis, J. Barelds, S. Brenton, Sherree Cotter, Mary-lou Hagebols, Kirsty Woolman, M. Annells, T. Koch","doi":"10.1177/104990910201900311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated two quality-of-life assessment and measurement tools, the Client Generated Index and the McGill Quality of Life questionnaire, within palliative care nursing. Primarily tested was the feasibility of the tools to assess clients’ QOL at admission and, if necessary, when their condition altered. The reliability of the tools has previously been ascertained. Additionally, quality of dying during the last two days of life for 14 participants who died during the study was assessed and measured retrospectively by these tools, using the client’s nominated care-giver as proxy for the client. It is this second focus that we report on here. The reasons why proxy assessment and measurement of client QOD was not useful or feasible are discussed.","PeriodicalId":7716,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®","volume":"3 1","pages":"193 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/104990910201900311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This study evaluated two quality-of-life assessment and measurement tools, the Client Generated Index and the McGill Quality of Life questionnaire, within palliative care nursing. Primarily tested was the feasibility of the tools to assess clients’ QOL at admission and, if necessary, when their condition altered. The reliability of the tools has previously been ascertained. Additionally, quality of dying during the last two days of life for 14 participants who died during the study was assessed and measured retrospectively by these tools, using the client’s nominated care-giver as proxy for the client. It is this second focus that we report on here. The reasons why proxy assessment and measurement of client QOD was not useful or feasible are discussed.
使用照护者作为代理对姑息治疗病人的死亡质量进行回顾性评估和测量
本研究评估了姑息治疗护理中的两种生活质量评估和测量工具,即客户生成指数和麦吉尔生活质量问卷。主要测试的是在入院时评估患者生活质量的工具的可行性,如果有必要,当他们的病情发生变化时。这些工具的可靠性先前已得到确认。此外,14名在研究期间死亡的参与者在生命最后两天的死亡质量通过这些工具进行回顾性评估和测量,使用客户指定的护理人员作为客户的代理。我们在这里报道的是第二个重点。讨论了代理评价和测量客户QOD不实用和不可行的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信