Housing Estates as Experimental Fields of Social Research

Yasushi Sukenari
{"title":"Housing Estates as Experimental Fields of Social Research","authors":"Yasushi Sukenari","doi":"10.21588/DNS.2016.45.1.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses researchers’ relationships with their research object and its transformation in empirical sociology by examining “danchi” (housing estates) studies conducted by Japanese sociologists. The Japanese housing policy system was quickly established in the early 1950s, and the reinforced concrete housing complexes stimulated journalistic interest. Most influential researchers in postwar Japanese sociology launched into research on these newly constructed housing estates. One reason was that social surveys with standardized questionnaires to individual respondents were compatible with the new housing form. Danchi became experimental fields of social research. Some early researchers emphasized the sparsity of neighbor relationships in danchi and the surviving kinship across geographical boundaries. However, the image of danchi as pictured by sociologists transformed around 1960. Studies of residents’ associations showed that danchi communities were being formed through cooperative solutions found for residents’ common problems. Whether or not a housing estate was formed as a community depended on how the residents related to the space. This change was also reflected in the relationships between the researchers and the respondents in that the distance between them under the standardized attitude and opinion survey was lost. The change in the image of housing estates in the 1960s can be said to overlap with a turning point in social research.","PeriodicalId":84572,"journal":{"name":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","volume":"17 1","pages":"69-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and society (Soul Taehakkyo. Institute for Social Devdelopment and Policy Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21588/DNS.2016.45.1.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper discusses researchers’ relationships with their research object and its transformation in empirical sociology by examining “danchi” (housing estates) studies conducted by Japanese sociologists. The Japanese housing policy system was quickly established in the early 1950s, and the reinforced concrete housing complexes stimulated journalistic interest. Most influential researchers in postwar Japanese sociology launched into research on these newly constructed housing estates. One reason was that social surveys with standardized questionnaires to individual respondents were compatible with the new housing form. Danchi became experimental fields of social research. Some early researchers emphasized the sparsity of neighbor relationships in danchi and the surviving kinship across geographical boundaries. However, the image of danchi as pictured by sociologists transformed around 1960. Studies of residents’ associations showed that danchi communities were being formed through cooperative solutions found for residents’ common problems. Whether or not a housing estate was formed as a community depended on how the residents related to the space. This change was also reflected in the relationships between the researchers and the respondents in that the distance between them under the standardized attitude and opinion survey was lost. The change in the image of housing estates in the 1960s can be said to overlap with a turning point in social research.
住宅小区作为社会研究的实验领域
本文通过对日本社会学家对“团地”的研究,探讨了实证社会学中研究者与研究对象的关系及其转变。日本的住房政策体系在20世纪50年代初迅速建立起来,钢筋混凝土住宅综合体激发了新闻记者的兴趣。战后日本社会学中最具影响力的研究者开始对这些新建的住宅小区进行研究。其中一个原因是,对个人受访者进行标准化问卷调查的社会调查与新的住房表格兼容。团池成为社会研究的试验田。一些早期的研究者强调了团地邻居关系的稀疏性和跨越地理边界幸存下来的亲属关系。然而,社会学家描绘的团地形象在1960年左右发生了变化。对居民协会的研究表明,团池社区是通过为居民共同问题寻找合作解决方案而形成的。一个住宅区是否形成一个社区取决于居民与空间的关系。这种变化也体现在研究者和被调查者之间的关系上,在标准化的态度和意见调查下,他们之间的距离消失了。六十年代屋苑形象的改变,可以说与社会研究的一个转折点重叠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书