Comparison of clinical efficacy between suture embedding method and bandage contact lens in pterygium excision

Qianyin Zheng
{"title":"Comparison of clinical efficacy between suture embedding method and bandage contact lens in pterygium excision","authors":"Qianyin Zheng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2019.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the clinical efficacy between suture embedding method in pterygium excision and bandage contact lens after pterygium excision. \n \n \nMethods \nA prospective, randomized and controlled case study. The data of 106 eyes of 106 patients who underwent pterygium excision combined with autologous conjunctival flap graft transplantation in this hospital from Aug. 2017 to Aug. 2018 were collected and analyzed. All patients were divided into three groups randomly, included suture embedding group, bandage contact lens group and control group. \n \n \nResults \nThe pain was assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS). The scores in bandage contact lens group was less than that in suture embedding group at 1day postoperatively(P=0.001). There was no significant difference of pain score between bandage contact lens group and suture embedding group at 3 and 7 days after operation(P=0.213, 0.676). The area of corneal epithelium fluorescent staining in bandage contact lens group were less than that in suture embedding group at 1 and 3 days after operation (P=0.001, 0.020). There was no significant difference between bandage contact lens group and suture embedding group at 7 days after operation in corneal epithelium fluorescent staining area (P=0.173). \n \n \nConclusion \nApplication of bandage contact lens after pterygium excision in alleviation of corneal irritation and pain is better than suture embedding method. And bandage contact lens can promote corneal epithelial healing effectively. \n \n \nKey words: \nSurgery, pterygium; Bandage contact lens, corneal; Suture embedding","PeriodicalId":10126,"journal":{"name":"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2019.12.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between suture embedding method in pterygium excision and bandage contact lens after pterygium excision. Methods A prospective, randomized and controlled case study. The data of 106 eyes of 106 patients who underwent pterygium excision combined with autologous conjunctival flap graft transplantation in this hospital from Aug. 2017 to Aug. 2018 were collected and analyzed. All patients were divided into three groups randomly, included suture embedding group, bandage contact lens group and control group. Results The pain was assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS). The scores in bandage contact lens group was less than that in suture embedding group at 1day postoperatively(P=0.001). There was no significant difference of pain score between bandage contact lens group and suture embedding group at 3 and 7 days after operation(P=0.213, 0.676). The area of corneal epithelium fluorescent staining in bandage contact lens group were less than that in suture embedding group at 1 and 3 days after operation (P=0.001, 0.020). There was no significant difference between bandage contact lens group and suture embedding group at 7 days after operation in corneal epithelium fluorescent staining area (P=0.173). Conclusion Application of bandage contact lens after pterygium excision in alleviation of corneal irritation and pain is better than suture embedding method. And bandage contact lens can promote corneal epithelial healing effectively. Key words: Surgery, pterygium; Bandage contact lens, corneal; Suture embedding
缝合埋点法与绷带接触镜在翼状胬肉切除术中的临床疗效比较
目的比较缝合埋点法在翼状胬肉切除术中的临床疗效与翼状胬肉切除术后绷带接触镜的疗效。方法采用前瞻性、随机对照病例研究。收集我院2017年8月至2018年8月行翼状胬肉切除联合自体结膜瓣移植的106例患者106只眼的资料进行分析。所有患者随机分为三组:包埋缝线组、绷带隐形眼镜组和对照组。结果采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)对疼痛进行评定。术后1d,绷带隐形眼镜组评分低于缝线埋置组(P=0.001)。术后3 d、7 d绷带隐形眼镜组与包埋缝线组疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P=0.213、0.676)。术后1、3 d,绷带隐形眼镜组角膜上皮荧光染色面积均小于缝线包埋组(P=0.001、0.020)。术后7 d角膜上皮荧光染色面积绷带隐形眼镜组与缝线包埋组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.173)。结论翼状胬肉切除术后应用绷带接触镜减轻角膜刺激和疼痛的效果优于包埋缝合。绷带式隐形眼镜能有效促进角膜上皮愈合。关键词:外科;翼状胬肉;绷带隐形眼镜、角膜;缝合嵌入
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8728
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信