Therapeutic effect of two fluoride varnishes on remineralisation of white spot lesions evaluated by laser fluorescence

Q4 Medicine
R. Knežević, J. Vojinović
{"title":"Therapeutic effect of two fluoride varnishes on remineralisation of white spot lesions evaluated by laser fluorescence","authors":"R. Knežević, J. Vojinović","doi":"10.5937/scriptamed53-35056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background / Aim: The presence of white spot lesion (WSL) is considered the first stage of dental caries. The early detection and diagnosis of WSL is of crucial importance, since caries can be prevented at this stage, reversed and/or controlled by elimination of etiological factors and by use of fluorides. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy between the two fluoride varnishes on WSL remineralisation evaluated by laser fluorescence. Methods: A total of 30 children and 60 WSL cases (2 per each child) were included in this study. The selected WSL were randomly divided into two groups in each child: G1 applying Fluor Protector S®, Vivadent, Lichenstein (n = 30) and G2 applying MI varnish®, GC, Tokyo, Japan (n = 30). The fluoride varnishes were submitted to three applications: at baseline, four weeks and eight weeks following the baseline, according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Mineral density of the enamel was measured using laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent® 2095, KaVo, Biberach, Germany) for each WSL. Laser fluorescence (LF) measurements were performed at baseline and at fourth, eighth and twelfth week after starting the treatment and LF scores were calculated. Results: By comparing LF scores at each measurement after treatment initiation, it was found that the scores were significantly lower in all groups when compared to baseline. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that both fluoride varnishes used were capable of remineralising WSL as evaluated by LF measurements. No difference was noted in the remineralising efficacy of the varnishes despite their different compositions. The main limitations of this study are small sample size and short follow up period. Therefore, further studies with large sample size and a longer follow up are, however, necessary.","PeriodicalId":33497,"journal":{"name":"Scripta Medica","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scripta Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/scriptamed53-35056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background / Aim: The presence of white spot lesion (WSL) is considered the first stage of dental caries. The early detection and diagnosis of WSL is of crucial importance, since caries can be prevented at this stage, reversed and/or controlled by elimination of etiological factors and by use of fluorides. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy between the two fluoride varnishes on WSL remineralisation evaluated by laser fluorescence. Methods: A total of 30 children and 60 WSL cases (2 per each child) were included in this study. The selected WSL were randomly divided into two groups in each child: G1 applying Fluor Protector S®, Vivadent, Lichenstein (n = 30) and G2 applying MI varnish®, GC, Tokyo, Japan (n = 30). The fluoride varnishes were submitted to three applications: at baseline, four weeks and eight weeks following the baseline, according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Mineral density of the enamel was measured using laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent® 2095, KaVo, Biberach, Germany) for each WSL. Laser fluorescence (LF) measurements were performed at baseline and at fourth, eighth and twelfth week after starting the treatment and LF scores were calculated. Results: By comparing LF scores at each measurement after treatment initiation, it was found that the scores were significantly lower in all groups when compared to baseline. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that both fluoride varnishes used were capable of remineralising WSL as evaluated by LF measurements. No difference was noted in the remineralising efficacy of the varnishes despite their different compositions. The main limitations of this study are small sample size and short follow up period. Therefore, further studies with large sample size and a longer follow up are, however, necessary.
激光荧光法评价两种氟化物清漆对白斑病变再矿化的治疗效果
背景/目的:白斑病变(WSL)的出现被认为是龋的第一阶段。早期发现和诊断WSL至关重要,因为在这一阶段可以预防龋齿,通过消除病因和使用氟化物来逆转和/或控制龋齿。本研究的目的是比较两种氟化物清漆对激光荧光评价的WSL再矿化的效果。方法:本研究共纳入30例儿童和60例WSL,每例2例。选择的WSL随机分为两组:G1组使用氟保护剂S®,Vivadent, Lichenstein (n = 30), G2组使用MI清漆®,GC,东京,日本(n = 30)。根据制造商的建议,氟化物清漆提交了三种申请:基线时、基线后四周和基线后八周。每个WSL使用激光荧光(DIAGNOdent®2095,KaVo, Biberach, Germany)测量牙釉质的矿物密度。在基线和治疗开始后第4、8、12周进行激光荧光(LF)测量,并计算LF评分。结果:通过比较治疗开始后每次测量的LF评分,发现与基线相比,所有组的评分均显着降低。结论:本研究结果表明,使用的两种氟化物清漆都能够通过LF测量来评估WSL的再矿化。尽管清漆的成分不同,但其再矿化效果没有差异。本研究的主要局限性是样本量小,随访时间短。因此,进一步的大样本量的研究和较长的随访是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信