Call-and-Response: How Use of the Chat in a Virtual Large Group Shifted the Frame to Increase Inclusivity

Group Pub Date : 2022-08-06 DOI:10.1353/grp.2022.0000
Robin Dean, Nancy W. Kelly, A. Smolar, Sriya Bhattacharyya, Zoe Towler, Eric Whitney, Wern How Yam, I. Reiniger
{"title":"Call-and-Response: How Use of the Chat in a Virtual Large Group Shifted the Frame to Increase Inclusivity","authors":"Robin Dean, Nancy W. Kelly, A. Smolar, Sriya Bhattacharyya, Zoe Towler, Eric Whitney, Wern How Yam, I. Reiniger","doi":"10.1353/grp.2022.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this article, the author discusses his clinical experiences as an individual and group therapist during the era of political tumult from 2016 to 2021. Through case examples, he focuses on topics that have been raised more commonly from 2017 to 2022, especially thorny subjects that have historically been avoided by therapists, particularly race, politics, and group identifications. He describes his rationale for addressing these subjects, which is made particularly difficult when the therapist is offended by the patient's perspective or views. The author posits that three main variables influence the way patients express anxiety about the political events surrounding them: the degree of dyadic and group attachment security experienced within their families of origin, the degree of splitting they employ as a defense, and their degree of trust or mistrust in social institutions.","PeriodicalId":90511,"journal":{"name":"Group","volume":"5 4 1","pages":"101 - 103 - 105 - 107 - 109 - 11 - 111 - 13 - 20 - 21 - 43 - 45 - 7 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/grp.2022.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In this article, the author discusses his clinical experiences as an individual and group therapist during the era of political tumult from 2016 to 2021. Through case examples, he focuses on topics that have been raised more commonly from 2017 to 2022, especially thorny subjects that have historically been avoided by therapists, particularly race, politics, and group identifications. He describes his rationale for addressing these subjects, which is made particularly difficult when the therapist is offended by the patient's perspective or views. The author posits that three main variables influence the way patients express anxiety about the political events surrounding them: the degree of dyadic and group attachment security experienced within their families of origin, the degree of splitting they employ as a defense, and their degree of trust or mistrust in social institutions.
呼叫与回应:在一个虚拟的大群体中如何使用聊天工具来改变框架以增加包容性
摘要:作者在本文中讨论了他在2016年至2021年政治动荡时期作为个体和团体治疗师的临床经验。通过案例,他专注于从2017年到2022年更常见的话题,尤其是治疗师历来回避的棘手话题,尤其是种族、政治和群体认同。他描述了他处理这些问题的基本原理,当治疗师被病人的观点或观点冒犯时,这就变得特别困难。作者认为,有三个主要变量影响患者对周围政治事件表达焦虑的方式:他们在原生家庭中经历的二元和群体依恋安全程度,他们作为防御手段的分裂程度,以及他们对社会机构的信任或不信任程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信