Role of Metaphors in Controlling Meaning Making Processes: ‘War’ and ‘Fire’ Metaphor for COVID-19 Pandemic

Misbah Rafat
{"title":"Role of Metaphors in Controlling Meaning Making Processes: ‘War’ and ‘Fire’ Metaphor for COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Misbah Rafat","doi":"10.58425/llj.v1i1.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: In recent times, development of languages has endorsed complexities and has advanced the communicative strategies. This present research has studied the role of ‘war’ and ‘fire’ metaphors for COVID-19 pandemic in influencing thinking pattern of people to analyze the differences in the meaning attached to the concepts of metaphors.\nMethodology: Open ended questionnaires were designed in qualitative research method and responses were encoded to generate the emerging patterns of meanings.\nFindings: The results have shown the contrasting features of the meaning making sense of people in accordance with the metaphors and it further gave way to analyze the conscious impact of usage of metaphors by higher authorities in molding public’s thought according to their own interest. Fire metaphor has enraged the feeling of suffocation and fast rate of transmission of this pandemic while ‘war’ metaphor has raised the meaning of killing of people and people has assumed this pandemic as an enemy which has turned this world into a battlefield.\nConclusion: Figurative and non-figurative languages elicited different responses.  Non-figurative language did not instigated any kind of fear among the participants.\nRecommendation: Future studies can be conducted to scrutinize the ideological use of metaphors by the politicians which insinuate audience in one way or another.","PeriodicalId":30933,"journal":{"name":"Rainbow Journal of Literature Linguistics and Culture","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rainbow Journal of Literature Linguistics and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58425/llj.v1i1.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: In recent times, development of languages has endorsed complexities and has advanced the communicative strategies. This present research has studied the role of ‘war’ and ‘fire’ metaphors for COVID-19 pandemic in influencing thinking pattern of people to analyze the differences in the meaning attached to the concepts of metaphors. Methodology: Open ended questionnaires were designed in qualitative research method and responses were encoded to generate the emerging patterns of meanings. Findings: The results have shown the contrasting features of the meaning making sense of people in accordance with the metaphors and it further gave way to analyze the conscious impact of usage of metaphors by higher authorities in molding public’s thought according to their own interest. Fire metaphor has enraged the feeling of suffocation and fast rate of transmission of this pandemic while ‘war’ metaphor has raised the meaning of killing of people and people has assumed this pandemic as an enemy which has turned this world into a battlefield. Conclusion: Figurative and non-figurative languages elicited different responses.  Non-figurative language did not instigated any kind of fear among the participants. Recommendation: Future studies can be conducted to scrutinize the ideological use of metaphors by the politicians which insinuate audience in one way or another.
隐喻在控制意义生成过程中的作用:COVID-19大流行的“战争”和“火”隐喻
目的:近年来,语言的发展增加了复杂性,促进了交际策略的发展。本研究通过研究COVID-19大流行的“战争”和“火”隐喻对人们思维模式的影响,分析隐喻概念所附带意义的差异。研究方法:采用质性研究方法设计开放式问卷,对问卷的回答进行编码,生成意义的新模式。发现:研究结果显示了人们根据隐喻理解意义的对比特征,并进一步为分析上级机关根据自身利益对公众思想塑造的有意识影响提供了依据。火的比喻激怒了这种大流行的窒息感和快速传播的感觉,而“战争”的比喻则提出了杀戮的含义,人们把这种大流行当作敌人,把这个世界变成了战场。结论:比喻性语言和非比喻性语言引起的反应不同。非比喻性语言并没有在参与者中引起任何恐惧。建议:未来的研究可以仔细研究政治家在意识形态上使用隐喻,以这样或那样的方式暗示听众。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信