Dismantling deficit thinking in academic libraries: theory, reflection, and action

Q3 Social Sciences
Amy Lewontin
{"title":"Dismantling deficit thinking in academic libraries: theory, reflection, and action","authors":"Amy Lewontin","doi":"10.1080/15228959.2022.2085424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of this new and much-needed book, Dismantling Deficit Thinking in Academic Libraries , offer the reader an understanding of the concept, a plan of action for academic librarians, and many thoughtful ways to consider and reflect on ways to transform their teaching and run their libraries. The book is organized into four discrete chapters, with many sug-gested readings deftly woven into the essays. Particularly worth noting are the thoughtful reflections from librarians in the field after each chapter. The authors have reached out widely into the library field to explore many different points of view. These reflective pieces discuss educational challenges and practices of librarians in the classroom and educational spaces in general. They have been written by a broad mix of librarians, including Cynthia Mari Orozco, Librarian for Equitable Services at East Los Angeles College; Naomi Binnie, the Digital Education Librarian at the University of Michigan; and Yi Ding, Online Instructional Design Librarian at California State University at Northridge, among many others. The authors begin the first section with a brief introductory history of deficit thinking in educational practice, which many readers new to this subject will find illuminating. As the authors describe this slim book, it is meant to be between the practical and the theoretical. For a topic that may be new to many academic librarians, it offers a way to understand and navigate the principles behind “ anti-deficit thinking ” and how to dismantle it in an easily understandable style.","PeriodicalId":35381,"journal":{"name":"Public Services Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2022.2085424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The authors of this new and much-needed book, Dismantling Deficit Thinking in Academic Libraries , offer the reader an understanding of the concept, a plan of action for academic librarians, and many thoughtful ways to consider and reflect on ways to transform their teaching and run their libraries. The book is organized into four discrete chapters, with many sug-gested readings deftly woven into the essays. Particularly worth noting are the thoughtful reflections from librarians in the field after each chapter. The authors have reached out widely into the library field to explore many different points of view. These reflective pieces discuss educational challenges and practices of librarians in the classroom and educational spaces in general. They have been written by a broad mix of librarians, including Cynthia Mari Orozco, Librarian for Equitable Services at East Los Angeles College; Naomi Binnie, the Digital Education Librarian at the University of Michigan; and Yi Ding, Online Instructional Design Librarian at California State University at Northridge, among many others. The authors begin the first section with a brief introductory history of deficit thinking in educational practice, which many readers new to this subject will find illuminating. As the authors describe this slim book, it is meant to be between the practical and the theoretical. For a topic that may be new to many academic librarians, it offers a way to understand and navigate the principles behind “ anti-deficit thinking ” and how to dismantle it in an easily understandable style.
消除高校图书馆的赤字思维:理论、反思与行动
这本急需的新书《拆除学术图书馆的赤字思维》的作者为读者提供了对这一概念的理解,为学术图书馆管理员提供了一个行动计划,以及许多深思熟虑的方法来考虑和反思如何改变他们的教学和运营图书馆。这本书分为四个独立的章节,许多建议的阅读材料巧妙地融入了文章中。特别值得注意的是图书馆员在每章之后的深思熟虑。作者广泛涉猎图书馆领域,探索了许多不同的观点。这些反思性的作品讨论了在课堂和教育空间中图书馆员的教育挑战和实践。它们是由各种各样的图书管理员撰写的,其中包括东洛杉矶学院公平服务图书管理员辛西娅·马里·奥罗斯科;密歇根大学数字教育图书馆员内奥米·宾尼;以及北岭加州州立大学在线教学设计图书管理员丁毅(Yi Ding)等。作者首先简要介绍了教育实践中缺陷思维的历史,许多刚接触这一主题的读者会发现这是有启发性的。正如作者所描述的那样,这本薄薄的书是介于实践和理论之间的。对于许多学术图书馆员来说,这可能是一个新的话题,它提供了一种理解和驾驭“反赤字思维”背后的原则的方法,以及如何以一种容易理解的方式将其拆解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Services Quarterly
Public Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Public Services Quarterly covers a broad spectrum of public service issues in academic libraries, presenting practical strategies for implementing new initiatives and research-based insights into effective practices. The journal publishes research-based and theoretical articles as well as case studies that advance the understanding of public services, including reference and research assistance, information literacy instruction, access and delivery services, and other services to patrons. Articles may examine creative ways to use technology to assist students and faculty. Practice-based articles should be thoroughly grounded in the literature and should situate the work done in one library into the larger context of the situation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信