Evolving ethics envy—New Zealand sociologists reading the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Kotuitui Pub Date : 2014-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1177083X.2013.867513

Martin Tolich, BP Smith

{"title":"Evolving ethics envy—New Zealand sociologists reading the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans","authors":"Martin Tolich, BP Smith","doi":"10.1080/1177083X.2013.867513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS 2) a visionary document when viewed in comparison with the ways ethics review is enacted in New Zealand. New Zealand has unequivocal guidelines for indigenous research. The indigenous guidelines in Chapter 9 of the Canadian document are particularly innovative, in that they prescribe indigenous consultation for some, but not all researchers. In New Zealand, according to the Health Research Council Te Ara Tika guidelines, all research in New Zealand warrants indigenous consultation. This paper suggests that progress around improving the practice of consultation and engagement with Māori could be made if the consultation requirements for mainstream research were to be paper based, and reviewed by an ethics committee without actual expectation of mandatory consultation conditions. On the other hand, Māori centred research should require actual and detailed evidence of consultation that would be tied to an explicit articulation of the mutual understanding of the benefits accruing from this relationship.","PeriodicalId":39455,"journal":{"name":"Kotuitui","volume":"75 3 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kotuitui","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2013.867513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 29

Abstract

This paper considers the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (TCPS 2) a visionary document when viewed in comparison with the ways ethics review is enacted in New Zealand. New Zealand has unequivocal guidelines for indigenous research. The indigenous guidelines in Chapter 9 of the Canadian document are particularly innovative, in that they prescribe indigenous consultation for some, but not all researchers. In New Zealand, according to the Health Research Council Te Ara Tika guidelines, all research in New Zealand warrants indigenous consultation. This paper suggests that progress around improving the practice of consultation and engagement with Māori could be made if the consultation requirements for mainstream research were to be paper based, and reviewed by an ethics committee without actual expectation of mandatory consultation conditions. On the other hand, Māori centred research should require actual and detailed evidence of consultation that would be tied to an explicit articulation of the mutual understanding of the benefits accruing from this relationship.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不断发展的伦理嫉妒——新西兰社会学家阅读加拿大三理事会政策声明:涉及人类研究的伦理行为

本文认为加拿大三理事会政策声明:涉及人类研究的道德行为(TCPS 2)是一份有远见的文件，当与新西兰制定的伦理审查方式进行比较时。新西兰对本土研究有明确的指导方针。加拿大文件第9章的土著指导方针特别具有创新性，因为它们规定向一些而不是所有研究人员提供土著咨询。在新西兰，根据卫生研究理事会的《土著居民生活指南》，新西兰的所有研究都应征求土著居民的意见。本文建议，如果主流研究的咨询要求是基于论文的，并由伦理委员会审查，而不实际期望强制性咨询条件，则可以在改善咨询和参与Māori的实践方面取得进展。另一方面，以Māori为中心的研究应要求协商的实际和详细证据，这些证据将与明确阐明双方对这种关系所产生的利益的相互理解联系在一起。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Kotuitui Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online is an international, open-access research journal published for social scientists in tertiary and research institutions and other organisations worldwide. The Maori name Kotuitui means interweaving and reflects the interdisciplinary nature of the journal. This open access, peer-reviewed journal encourages top-flight social science inquiry and research across all social science disciplines. It also recognises contributions made by the social science research community to other disciplines, including biological and physical sciences, and promotes connections between all research communities.