Big data, algoritmos y política: las ciencias sociales en la era de las redes digitales

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY

Cinta de Moebio Pub Date : 2019-08-19 DOI:10.4067/s0717-554x2019000200267

F. González

{"title":"Big data, algoritmos y política: las ciencias sociales en la era de las redes digitales","authors":"F. González","doi":"10.4067/s0717-554x2019000200267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: El presente articulo ofrece un estado del arte de como se ha venido a estudiar empiricamente la relacion entre politica y redes sociales en la ultima decada, desde el punto de vista de la naturaleza del objeto de estudio, las nuevas tecnicas de analisis y metodos sobre las que se han apoyado las ciencias sociales, las agendas de investigacion a que ha dado lugar y algunos de los dilemas eticos que suscita. El articulo consta de tres partes. Primero, desarrollamos una discusion de los principales metodos de analisis de la relacion entre politica y redes sociales, el big data y los algoritmos, y lo comparamos con los metodos tradicionales de encuestas de opinion. Segundo, ofrecemos una revision de las principales preocupaciones que han guiado la investigacion en los ultimos diez anos: la representacion y campanas politicas, nuevas comunidades politicas y nuevas formas de accion colectiva. Finalmente, la tercera seccion reflexiona sobre los dilemas eticos y debates que plantea el uso de las nuevas tecnicas de analisis en las ciencias sociales. EnglishAbstract: The article offers a state of art about the empirical study of the relationship between politics and social media during the last decade, from the point of view of the nature of the subject, new research techniques and methods used in the social sciences, the research agendas it has fostered, and some of the ethical dilemmas this research raises. The article is divided in three main parts. Firstly, we develop a discussion of the main research methods to approach the relationship between politics and digital media, big data and algorithms, which we compare with traditional opinion polls. Secondly, we offer a review of the main issues that have guided this research agenda during the last ten years: political representation and campaigns, emerging political communities, and new forms of collective action. Finally, the last section reflects on the ethical dilemmas and debates that arise from the utilization of new research methods in the social sciences.","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2019000200267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

Abstract

espanolResumen: El presente articulo ofrece un estado del arte de como se ha venido a estudiar empiricamente la relacion entre politica y redes sociales en la ultima decada, desde el punto de vista de la naturaleza del objeto de estudio, las nuevas tecnicas de analisis y metodos sobre las que se han apoyado las ciencias sociales, las agendas de investigacion a que ha dado lugar y algunos de los dilemas eticos que suscita. El articulo consta de tres partes. Primero, desarrollamos una discusion de los principales metodos de analisis de la relacion entre politica y redes sociales, el big data y los algoritmos, y lo comparamos con los metodos tradicionales de encuestas de opinion. Segundo, ofrecemos una revision de las principales preocupaciones que han guiado la investigacion en los ultimos diez anos: la representacion y campanas politicas, nuevas comunidades politicas y nuevas formas de accion colectiva. Finalmente, la tercera seccion reflexiona sobre los dilemas eticos y debates que plantea el uso de las nuevas tecnicas de analisis en las ciencias sociales. EnglishAbstract: The article offers a state of art about the empirical study of the relationship between politics and social media during the last decade, from the point of view of the nature of the subject, new research techniques and methods used in the social sciences, the research agendas it has fostered, and some of the ethical dilemmas this research raises. The article is divided in three main parts. Firstly, we develop a discussion of the main research methods to approach the relationship between politics and digital media, big data and algorithms, which we compare with traditional opinion polls. Secondly, we offer a review of the main issues that have guided this research agenda during the last ten years: political representation and campaigns, emerging political communities, and new forms of collective action. Finally, the last section reflects on the ethical dilemmas and debates that arise from the utilization of new research methods in the social sciences.

查看原文本刊更多论文

大数据、算法与政治:数字网络时代的社会科学

espanolResumen:本文章概述了艺术的状态,一直学习empiricamente政治和社交网络之间的关系在过去的十年中,从自然的角度研究对象,新的分析和tecnicas metodos关于议程提供了支持,社会科学的调查导致了和一些eticos难题引起。本文由三部分组成。首先，我们讨论了分析政治与社交网络、大数据与算法关系的主要方法，并将其与传统的民意调查方法进行了比较。首先，我们回顾过去十年中指导研究的主要问题:代表和政治运动、新的政治社区和新的集体行动形式。最后，第三部分反思了在社会科学中使用新的分析技术所引发的伦理困境和争论。EnglishAbstract: The offers条a state of art about The经验study of The relationship between politics and social media during The过去十年,from The point of view of The nature of The subject, new社会科学研究中使用的技术和方法、研究议程fostered, some of The道德dilemmas this research raises。这篇文章分为三个主要部分。首先，我们讨论了处理政治与数字媒体、大数据和算法之间关系的主要研究方法，并将其与传统民意调查进行了比较。第二，我们回顾过去十年来指导本研究议程的主要问题:政治代表和竞选、新兴的政治团体和新的集体行动形式。最后，最后一节反映了在社会科学中使用新的研究方法所引起的伦理困境和争论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cinta de Moebio PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.