Rethinking the Work of Theologians in the Pandemic's Wake

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Horizons Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1017/hor.2023.5
K. L. Cox, J. King
{"title":"Rethinking the Work of Theologians in the Pandemic's Wake","authors":"K. L. Cox, J. King","doi":"10.1017/hor.2023.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on what the pandemic reveals about theological work in the academy and imagines a way forward. Too often, theologians are ground down, isolated workers, overworked, and strapped for time. They constantly must choose between progress in the guild and their familial and communal relationships. This false choice starves theologians of meaning and purpose, and, in such scarcity, inflames pursuit of status. However, a communal conception of theological academic work could mitigate some of these frictions. To imagine this possibility, we draw upon our collective experiences of working in Benedictine institutions that also argue for communal approaches to living, learning, and experiencing God. We draw ideas from the Rule of Benedict as a model for life-giving community that we think can be resituated in academic life.","PeriodicalId":13231,"journal":{"name":"Horizons","volume":"137 1","pages":"1 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hor.2023.5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on what the pandemic reveals about theological work in the academy and imagines a way forward. Too often, theologians are ground down, isolated workers, overworked, and strapped for time. They constantly must choose between progress in the guild and their familial and communal relationships. This false choice starves theologians of meaning and purpose, and, in such scarcity, inflames pursuit of status. However, a communal conception of theological academic work could mitigate some of these frictions. To imagine this possibility, we draw upon our collective experiences of working in Benedictine institutions that also argue for communal approaches to living, learning, and experiencing God. We draw ideas from the Rule of Benedict as a model for life-giving community that we think can be resituated in academic life.
重新思考大流行后神学家的工作
这篇文章的重点是大流行对学术界神学工作的启示,并设想了前进的道路。很多时候,神学家是被压制的,被孤立的工作者,工作过度,时间紧张。他们必须不断地在公会的进步和他们的家庭和社区关系之间做出选择。这种错误的选择使神学家缺乏意义和目的,在这种稀缺性中,激发了对地位的追求。然而,神学学术工作的共同概念可以减轻这些摩擦。为了想象这种可能性,我们借鉴了我们在本笃会机构工作的集体经验,这些机构也主张采用共同的方式来生活、学习和体验上帝。我们从本尼迪克特规则中汲取灵感,将其作为生命共同体的典范,我们认为这种模式可以在学术生活中重现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Horizons
Horizons RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信