Extending Fairness Expressibility of ECTL+: A Tree-Style One-Pass Tableau Approach

Time Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2018.5
A. Bolotov, Montserrat Hermo, P. Lucio
{"title":"Extending Fairness Expressibility of ECTL+: A Tree-Style One-Pass Tableau Approach","authors":"A. Bolotov, Montserrat Hermo, P. Lucio","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2018.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Temporal logic has become essential for various areas in computer science, most notably for the specification and verification of hardware and software systems. For the specification purposes rich temporal languages are required that, in particular, can express fairness constraints. For linear-time logics which deal with fairness in the linear-time setting, one-pass and two-pass tableau methods have been developed. In the repository of the CTL-type branching-time setting, the well-known logics ECTL and ECTL^+ were developed to explicitly deal with fairness. However, due to the syntactical restrictions, these logics can only express restricted versions of fairness. The logic CTL^*, often considered as \"the full branching-time logic\" overcomes these restrictions on expressing fairness. However, this logic itself, is extremely challenging for the application of verification techniques, and the tableau technique, in particular. For example, there is no one-pass tableau construction for this logic, while it is known that one-pass tableau has an additional benefit enabling the formulation of dual sequent calculi that are often treated as more \"natural\" being more friendly for human understanding. Based on these two considerations, the following problem arises - are there logics that have richer expressiveness than ECTL^+ yet \"simpler\" than CTL^* for which a one-pass tableau can be developed? In this paper we give a solution to this problem. We present a tree-style one-pass tableau for a sub-logic of CTL^* that we call ECTL^#, which is more expressive than ECTL^+ allowing the formulation of a new range of fairness constraints with \"until\" operator. The presentation of the tableau construction is accompanied by an algorithm for constructing a systematic tableau, for any given input of admissible branching-time formulae. We prove the termination, soundness and completeness of the method. As tree-shaped one-pass tableaux are well suited for the automation and are amenable for the implementation and for the formulation of sequent calculi, our results also open a prospect of relevant developments of the automation and implementation of the tableau method for ECTL^#, and of a dual sequent calculi.","PeriodicalId":75226,"journal":{"name":"Time","volume":"15 1","pages":"5:1-5:22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Time","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.TIME.2018.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Temporal logic has become essential for various areas in computer science, most notably for the specification and verification of hardware and software systems. For the specification purposes rich temporal languages are required that, in particular, can express fairness constraints. For linear-time logics which deal with fairness in the linear-time setting, one-pass and two-pass tableau methods have been developed. In the repository of the CTL-type branching-time setting, the well-known logics ECTL and ECTL^+ were developed to explicitly deal with fairness. However, due to the syntactical restrictions, these logics can only express restricted versions of fairness. The logic CTL^*, often considered as "the full branching-time logic" overcomes these restrictions on expressing fairness. However, this logic itself, is extremely challenging for the application of verification techniques, and the tableau technique, in particular. For example, there is no one-pass tableau construction for this logic, while it is known that one-pass tableau has an additional benefit enabling the formulation of dual sequent calculi that are often treated as more "natural" being more friendly for human understanding. Based on these two considerations, the following problem arises - are there logics that have richer expressiveness than ECTL^+ yet "simpler" than CTL^* for which a one-pass tableau can be developed? In this paper we give a solution to this problem. We present a tree-style one-pass tableau for a sub-logic of CTL^* that we call ECTL^#, which is more expressive than ECTL^+ allowing the formulation of a new range of fairness constraints with "until" operator. The presentation of the tableau construction is accompanied by an algorithm for constructing a systematic tableau, for any given input of admissible branching-time formulae. We prove the termination, soundness and completeness of the method. As tree-shaped one-pass tableaux are well suited for the automation and are amenable for the implementation and for the formulation of sequent calculi, our results also open a prospect of relevant developments of the automation and implementation of the tableau method for ECTL^#, and of a dual sequent calculi.
扩展ECTL+的公平性可表达性:一种树式单遍表方法
时间逻辑在计算机科学的各个领域都是必不可少的,尤其是在硬件和软件系统的规范和验证方面。为了规范的目的,需要丰富的时态语言,特别是能够表达公平性约束的语言。对于处理线性时间设定公平性的线性时间逻辑,已经开发了一遍和两遍表法。在ctl类型分支时间设置的存储库中,开发了著名的逻辑ECTL和ECTL^+来显式处理公平性。然而,由于语法的限制,这些逻辑只能表达有限版本的公平性。通常被认为是“全分支时间逻辑”的逻辑CTL^*克服了表达公平性的这些限制。然而,这种逻辑本身对于验证技术的应用来说是极具挑战性的,尤其是表格技术。例如,对于这种逻辑,没有一次通过的表格结构,而众所周知,一次通过的表格有一个额外的好处,使得对偶序列微积分的公式通常被认为是更“自然”的,对人类的理解更友好。基于这两个考虑,出现了以下问题—是否存在比ECTL^+具有更丰富的表达性,但比CTL^*“更简单”的逻辑,可以为其开发一次通过的表格?本文给出了解决这一问题的方法。我们为CTL^*的子逻辑(我们称之为ECTL^#)提供了一个树式的单遍表,它比ECTL^+更具表现力,允许使用“until”运算符制定新的公平性约束范围。对于任意给定的可容许的分支时间公式的输入,本文给出了构造系统表的算法。证明了该方法的有效性、合理性和完备性。由于树形的单遍表非常适合于自动化,并且适合于序列演算的实现和制定,我们的结果也为ECTL^#的表方法的自动化和实现以及对偶序列演算的相关发展开辟了前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信