Newly Sedentary Lanoh and the Communal Challenge: A Critical Commentary on Anarchist Anthropology

Q4 Environmental Science
Csilla Dallos
{"title":"Newly Sedentary Lanoh and the Communal Challenge: A Critical Commentary on Anarchist Anthropology","authors":"Csilla Dallos","doi":"10.3390/humans2010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussions of anarchic solidarity in relation to rainforest foragers have resulted in important insights into the sociality of such groups. However, whether anarchic solidarity prevails under the circumstances of regroupment and resettlement resulting in unprecedented communal projects has not been adequately addressed. These communal projects present new challenges to the social and community organization of previously mobile foragers. This article examines the extent to which newly sedentary Lanoh forager-traders of northern Perak, Malaysia, continue to display “cooperative autonomy”, a construct capturing both anarchist aspirations and key aspects of the sociality of egalitarian hunter-gatherers. This study suggests that though foragers such as Lanoh may superficially share attributes associated with anarchic solidarity, they profoundly differ from anarchists in their attitudes toward authority and cooperation. While ideological anarchism is clearly counter-dominant, the same cannot always be said about egalitarian foragers. We may conclude from this research that “cooperative autonomy” is still insufficiently understood and does not grant an assumptive blanket application across contexts. To promote our understanding of the sociality of small-scale societies, this construct requires further scrutiny and development.","PeriodicalId":35511,"journal":{"name":"Humans and Nature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humans and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/humans2010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discussions of anarchic solidarity in relation to rainforest foragers have resulted in important insights into the sociality of such groups. However, whether anarchic solidarity prevails under the circumstances of regroupment and resettlement resulting in unprecedented communal projects has not been adequately addressed. These communal projects present new challenges to the social and community organization of previously mobile foragers. This article examines the extent to which newly sedentary Lanoh forager-traders of northern Perak, Malaysia, continue to display “cooperative autonomy”, a construct capturing both anarchist aspirations and key aspects of the sociality of egalitarian hunter-gatherers. This study suggests that though foragers such as Lanoh may superficially share attributes associated with anarchic solidarity, they profoundly differ from anarchists in their attitudes toward authority and cooperation. While ideological anarchism is clearly counter-dominant, the same cannot always be said about egalitarian foragers. We may conclude from this research that “cooperative autonomy” is still insufficiently understood and does not grant an assumptive blanket application across contexts. To promote our understanding of the sociality of small-scale societies, this construct requires further scrutiny and development.
新近定居的拉诺与公共挑战:对无政府主义人类学的批判评论
关于雨林觅食者的无政府主义团结的讨论,对这类群体的社会性产生了重要的见解。然而,在重组和重新安置导致前所未有的社区项目的情况下,无政府主义的团结是否普遍存在,尚未得到充分解决。这些社区项目对以前流动觅食者的社会和社区组织提出了新的挑战。本文考察了居住在马来西亚北部Perak州的新定居的拉诺(Lanoh)采集者继续表现出“合作自治”的程度,这种结构既体现了无政府主义的愿望,也体现了平等主义狩猎采集者社会的关键方面。这项研究表明,虽然像Lanoh这样的觅食者表面上可能具有与无政府主义团结相关的属性,但他们在对权威和合作的态度上与无政府主义者有着深刻的不同。虽然意识形态无政府主义显然是反主导的,但平等主义的觅食者并不总是如此。我们可以从这项研究中得出结论,“合作自主”仍然没有得到充分的理解,也没有在各种情况下给予假设的全面应用。为了促进我们对小规模社会的社会性的理解,这种结构需要进一步的审查和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Humans and Nature
Humans and Nature Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信