Factors Affecting Persistence of Undergraduate Students in a Fisheries and Wildlife Program: Leavers1

Bjørn H. K. Wolter, Kelly F. Millenbah, Robert A. Montgomery, James W. Schneider
{"title":"Factors Affecting Persistence of Undergraduate Students in a Fisheries and Wildlife Program: Leavers1","authors":"Bjørn H. K. Wolter,&nbsp;Kelly F. Millenbah,&nbsp;Robert A. Montgomery,&nbsp;James W. Schneider","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0025u","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Undergraduate enrollment in natural resources-related programs are 13% lower than they were 30 years ago, even though overall collegiate enrollment has increased by roughly 8.5 million students during the same period. Because of this, we decided to investigate the question of student retention in a fisheries and wildlife (FW) program from the perspective of the students themselves. In this pilot study, we conducted face-to-face interviews with seven students who left a FW program (“leavers”), and asked them 13 questions related to their experiences at a large Midwestern university to better understand student reasons for leaving. Specific findings include: the importance of job prospects and earnings potential, a general reluctance to pursue postgraduate education, a degree of disillusionment at the relative lack of outdoor experiences offered, and a desire for more active participation in the undergraduate program. Some students expressed a feeling of deception at the realities of the departmental curriculum, although these were poorly defined and may be the product of other issues such as unrealistic program expectations. The results of this study inform the discussion on student retention and motivation in natural resource programs, and provide real-world suggestions on how to stem student attrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"40 1","pages":"10-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0025u","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2010.0025u","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Undergraduate enrollment in natural resources-related programs are 13% lower than they were 30 years ago, even though overall collegiate enrollment has increased by roughly 8.5 million students during the same period. Because of this, we decided to investigate the question of student retention in a fisheries and wildlife (FW) program from the perspective of the students themselves. In this pilot study, we conducted face-to-face interviews with seven students who left a FW program (“leavers”), and asked them 13 questions related to their experiences at a large Midwestern university to better understand student reasons for leaving. Specific findings include: the importance of job prospects and earnings potential, a general reluctance to pursue postgraduate education, a degree of disillusionment at the relative lack of outdoor experiences offered, and a desire for more active participation in the undergraduate program. Some students expressed a feeling of deception at the realities of the departmental curriculum, although these were poorly defined and may be the product of other issues such as unrealistic program expectations. The results of this study inform the discussion on student retention and motivation in natural resource programs, and provide real-world suggestions on how to stem student attrition.

影响大学生在渔业和野生动物项目中坚持的因素:叶片1
与30年前相比,自然资源相关专业的本科生入学人数减少了13%,尽管同期大学总入学人数增加了约850万。正因为如此,我们决定从学生自己的角度调查渔业和野生动物(FW)项目的学生保留问题。在这项初步研究中,我们对7名离开FW项目的学生(“离校者”)进行了面对面的采访,并向他们提出了13个与他们在中西部一所大型大学的经历相关的问题,以更好地了解学生离开的原因。具体的调查结果包括:就业前景和收入潜力的重要性,普遍不愿追求研究生教育,对相对缺乏户外体验感到失望,以及希望更积极地参与本科课程。一些学生对院系课程的现实有一种欺骗的感觉,尽管这些课程定义不清,可能是其他问题的产物,比如不切实际的课程期望。本研究的结果为自然资源项目中学生保留和动机的讨论提供了信息,并为如何阻止学生流失提供了现实世界的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信