Comparing the Spatial and Temporal Activity Patterns between Snapchat, Twitter and Flickr in Florida

Q3 Social Sciences
L. Juhász, H. Hochmair
{"title":"Comparing the Spatial and Temporal Activity Patterns between Snapchat, Twitter and Flickr in Florida","authors":"L. Juhász, H. Hochmair","doi":"10.1553/GISCIENCE2019_01_S134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media services generate enormous amounts of spatiotemporal data that can be used to characterize and analyse user activities and social behaviour. Although crowdsourced data have the advantage of comprehensive spatial and temporal coverage compared to data collected in more traditional ways, the various social media platforms target different user groups, which leads to user selection bias. Since data from social media platforms are used for a variety of geospatial applications, understanding such differences and their implications for analysis results is important for geoscientists. Therefore, this research analyses differences in spatial and temporal contribution patterns to three online platforms, namely Flickr, Twitter and Snapchat, over a six-week period in Florida. For the comparison of spatial contribution patterns, a set of negative binomial regression models are estimated to identify which socio-economic factors and characteristics of the built and natural environments are associated with contribution activities. The contribution differences observed are discussed in light of the targeted user groups and different purposes of the three platforms.","PeriodicalId":29645,"journal":{"name":"GI_Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GI_Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/GISCIENCE2019_01_S134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Social media services generate enormous amounts of spatiotemporal data that can be used to characterize and analyse user activities and social behaviour. Although crowdsourced data have the advantage of comprehensive spatial and temporal coverage compared to data collected in more traditional ways, the various social media platforms target different user groups, which leads to user selection bias. Since data from social media platforms are used for a variety of geospatial applications, understanding such differences and their implications for analysis results is important for geoscientists. Therefore, this research analyses differences in spatial and temporal contribution patterns to three online platforms, namely Flickr, Twitter and Snapchat, over a six-week period in Florida. For the comparison of spatial contribution patterns, a set of negative binomial regression models are estimated to identify which socio-economic factors and characteristics of the built and natural environments are associated with contribution activities. The contribution differences observed are discussed in light of the targeted user groups and different purposes of the three platforms.
比较佛罗里达州Snapchat, Twitter和Flickr的时空活动模式
社交媒体服务产生了大量的时空数据,这些数据可用于描述和分析用户活动和社会行为。虽然众包数据与传统方式相比具有时空覆盖全面的优势,但不同的社交媒体平台针对的用户群体不同,导致用户选择偏差。由于来自社交媒体平台的数据用于各种地理空间应用,因此了解这些差异及其对分析结果的影响对地球科学家来说非常重要。因此,本研究分析了佛罗里达州三个在线平台(Flickr, Twitter和Snapchat)在六周内的时空贡献模式差异。为了比较空间贡献模式,估计了一套负二项回归模型,以确定与贡献活动相关的社会经济因素和建筑环境和自然环境的特征。根据目标用户群和三个平台的不同目的,讨论了所观察到的贡献差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GI_Forum
GI_Forum Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信