Lesia Ukrainka: Ukrainian National Identity Against the "Russian Ukrainians" Dichotomy

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY
N. Tarasova
{"title":"Lesia Ukrainka: Ukrainian National Identity Against the \"Russian Ukrainians\" Dichotomy","authors":"N. Tarasova","doi":"10.15802/ampr.v0i23.283607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The article is dedicated to the research of Lesia Ukrainka’s correspondence, journalistic and literary-critical articles concerning the problem of national identity as a factor in overcoming the \"Russian Ukrainians\" dichotomy. Achieving this purpose involves solving the following tasks: 1) to reveal the poetess’s views on the essence and social manifestations of worldview fluctuations in the life activities of the Ukrainian elite at the end of the 19th and 20th centuries; 2) outline her strategy for overcoming cultural \"inter-words\" in the individual and society. Theoretical basis. The author applies the existential discourse of Foreignness by G. Marcel, criticism of Christianity by F. Nietzche, the theory of the nation by F. Meineke, typology of patriotism by A. Valitsky, the phenomenology of the relationship between the Self and the Other by J. Kristeva, the typology of the Stranger by B. Waldenfels, the ideas of D. Dontsov, O. Zabuzhko, S. Varetska, S. Matsenka, D. Melnyk, Y. Tarasiuk. Originality. The author proves that Lesia Ukrainka is one of the first among Ukrainian thinkers who critically considers the issue of dichotomy in the worldview and life world of \"Russian Ukrainians\" of the early twentieth century – One’s own and Others’, stopping in the uncertainty of one’s belonging to Russian or Ukrainian culture, rejection of national self-identification. Conclusions. The ways to overcome this dichotomy, alienation from the values of Ukrainian culture, betrayal, and collaborationism, Lesia Ukrainka sees, firstly, awareness of the cultural difference of Ukrainians, that is, the spiritual and psychological incompatibility of the Ukrainian national identity with the Russian one. Secondly, the need for an effective volitional separation from others and the political struggle for unification into the Ukrainian nation as a social and culturally self-sufficient collective self, worthy of a free dignified existence and recognition by other nations of the world.","PeriodicalId":42650,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i23.283607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The article is dedicated to the research of Lesia Ukrainka’s correspondence, journalistic and literary-critical articles concerning the problem of national identity as a factor in overcoming the "Russian Ukrainians" dichotomy. Achieving this purpose involves solving the following tasks: 1) to reveal the poetess’s views on the essence and social manifestations of worldview fluctuations in the life activities of the Ukrainian elite at the end of the 19th and 20th centuries; 2) outline her strategy for overcoming cultural "inter-words" in the individual and society. Theoretical basis. The author applies the existential discourse of Foreignness by G. Marcel, criticism of Christianity by F. Nietzche, the theory of the nation by F. Meineke, typology of patriotism by A. Valitsky, the phenomenology of the relationship between the Self and the Other by J. Kristeva, the typology of the Stranger by B. Waldenfels, the ideas of D. Dontsov, O. Zabuzhko, S. Varetska, S. Matsenka, D. Melnyk, Y. Tarasiuk. Originality. The author proves that Lesia Ukrainka is one of the first among Ukrainian thinkers who critically considers the issue of dichotomy in the worldview and life world of "Russian Ukrainians" of the early twentieth century – One’s own and Others’, stopping in the uncertainty of one’s belonging to Russian or Ukrainian culture, rejection of national self-identification. Conclusions. The ways to overcome this dichotomy, alienation from the values of Ukrainian culture, betrayal, and collaborationism, Lesia Ukrainka sees, firstly, awareness of the cultural difference of Ukrainians, that is, the spiritual and psychological incompatibility of the Ukrainian national identity with the Russian one. Secondly, the need for an effective volitional separation from others and the political struggle for unification into the Ukrainian nation as a social and culturally self-sufficient collective self, worthy of a free dignified existence and recognition by other nations of the world.
Lesia Ukrainka:反对“俄罗斯乌克兰人”二分法的乌克兰民族认同
目的。本文致力于研究Lesia Ukrainka的信件、新闻和文学评论文章,这些文章涉及民族认同问题,这是克服“俄罗斯乌克兰人”二分法的一个因素。实现这一目标需要解决以下任务:1)揭示女诗人对19世纪末和20世纪末乌克兰精英阶层生活活动中世界观波动的本质和社会表现的看法;2)概述她克服个人和社会文化“间词”的策略。理论基础。作者运用了马塞尔的《异域论》、尼采的《基督教批判》、迈内克的《民族论》、瓦利茨基的《爱国主义类型学》、克里斯蒂娃的《自我与他者》现象学、瓦尔登费尔斯的《陌生人》类型学、唐索夫、扎布日科、瓦列茨卡、马森卡、梅尔尼克、塔拉苏克等人的思想。创意。作者证明,在乌克兰思想家中,莱西娅是最早批判性地思考20世纪初“俄罗斯乌克兰人”的世界观和生活世界的二分法问题的人之一——“自己的”和“他者的”,止步于自己属于俄罗斯或乌克兰文化的不确定性,拒绝民族自我认同。结论。要克服这种对立、乌克兰文化价值观的异化、背叛和合作主义,Lesia Ukrainka认为,首先,要意识到乌克兰人的文化差异,即乌克兰民族认同与俄罗斯民族认同在精神和心理上的不相容。第二,需要进行有效的自愿分离,并进行政治斗争,以统一为乌克兰民族,使其成为一个社会和文化上自给自足的集体自我,值得有尊严地自由存在并得到世界其他国家的承认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信