Patients in Contemporary Russian Reproductive Health Care Institutions: Strategies of Establishing Trust

Q2 Social Sciences
A. Temkina, E. Zdravomyslova
{"title":"Patients in Contemporary Russian Reproductive Health Care Institutions: Strategies of Establishing Trust","authors":"A. Temkina, E. Zdravomyslova","doi":"10.3200/DEMO.16.3.277-293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Russian reproductive health care systems have undergone many changes since the 1990s. These changes have given users new opportunities, and users have become more demanding and knowledgeable. At the same time, patients distrust health care institutions and practitioners, which remains one of the Russian reproductive health care's most significant problems. The authors focus on public and private reproductive health care encounters from the patients' perspectives, concentrate on the women's experiences during pregnancy and delivery, explain patients' distrust of medical institutions, and examine the coping strategies patients develop to establish trust. Young, active, educated women do not want to be treated as Soviet patients--disciplined, ignorant, and obedient. They want to find a trustworthy doctor and receive reliable, comfortable, and proximate medical service. Keywords: distrust, health care, reproduction, Russia, strategies, women ********** Russian reproductive health care systems have undergone enormous changes since the 1990s. These changes reflect the economic breakdown of the state health care system, the commercialization of medical services, and attempts to solve Russia's demographic problems. These changes have not only given users new choices and opportunities but have also created unequal access to quality medical services. Russian attitudes toward reproductive health practices have also changed. Women have become more demanding and knowledgeable: they are consciously involved in family planning, including contraceptive use and the exploration of health care options on the Internet. However, patients' widespread distrust of both health care institutions and individual practitioners remains one of Russian reproductive health care's most significant dilemmas. (1) The issue of trust in medical institutions has been analyzed, starting with Talcott Parsons's classical model of clinical encounter, (2) but there have been few previous studies about this problem in the Russian reproductive health system. (3) Here, we focus on encounters in public and private reproductive health clinics from the patients' perspectives, concentrating on women's experiences during pregnancy and delivery. Following a bottom-up strategy of grounded theory (the \"systematic inductive guidelines for collecting and analyzing data for middle-range theoretical frameworks that explain the collected data\"), we reconstructed the leitmotif (master code) using thematic in-depth interviews. (4) This leitmotif is: \"We do not trust/believe our medicine/doctors.\" The leitmotif is exacerbated by patients' experiences in reproductive health care institutions. We also examine how women cope with needed medical assistance despite the trust deficit. We investigate patients' trust in public (insurance-covered and for-fee) and private (commercial) reproductive health services. We find that although women distrust both, they still confront the medical institutions and develop strategies to establish trust when seeking health care. Field data collected in 2005-6 consists of five participants' diaries and twenty-two in-depth interviews with female reproductive health service clients. (See appendix for the sample's description.) Our subjects were mostly middle-class women of reproductive age who had a postsecondary education. Most were private-sector professionals or ran their own small business. In this article, we discuss the reproductive health system reforms, providing institutional context for the clinical encounters. We then operationalize the concept of \"trust\" for our research purposes. We look at reproductive institutions, maternity-care institutions, and practitioners (gynecologists and obstetricians) as subjects of \"trust.\" We analyze different medical encounters in reproductive health institutions. We use this material to portray (1) women's distrust of these institutions; (2) trust-establishing strategies; and (3) new reproductive health patients' construction of their identity as patients. …","PeriodicalId":39667,"journal":{"name":"Demokratizatsiya","volume":"18 1","pages":"277-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demokratizatsiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.16.3.277-293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract: Russian reproductive health care systems have undergone many changes since the 1990s. These changes have given users new opportunities, and users have become more demanding and knowledgeable. At the same time, patients distrust health care institutions and practitioners, which remains one of the Russian reproductive health care's most significant problems. The authors focus on public and private reproductive health care encounters from the patients' perspectives, concentrate on the women's experiences during pregnancy and delivery, explain patients' distrust of medical institutions, and examine the coping strategies patients develop to establish trust. Young, active, educated women do not want to be treated as Soviet patients--disciplined, ignorant, and obedient. They want to find a trustworthy doctor and receive reliable, comfortable, and proximate medical service. Keywords: distrust, health care, reproduction, Russia, strategies, women ********** Russian reproductive health care systems have undergone enormous changes since the 1990s. These changes reflect the economic breakdown of the state health care system, the commercialization of medical services, and attempts to solve Russia's demographic problems. These changes have not only given users new choices and opportunities but have also created unequal access to quality medical services. Russian attitudes toward reproductive health practices have also changed. Women have become more demanding and knowledgeable: they are consciously involved in family planning, including contraceptive use and the exploration of health care options on the Internet. However, patients' widespread distrust of both health care institutions and individual practitioners remains one of Russian reproductive health care's most significant dilemmas. (1) The issue of trust in medical institutions has been analyzed, starting with Talcott Parsons's classical model of clinical encounter, (2) but there have been few previous studies about this problem in the Russian reproductive health system. (3) Here, we focus on encounters in public and private reproductive health clinics from the patients' perspectives, concentrating on women's experiences during pregnancy and delivery. Following a bottom-up strategy of grounded theory (the "systematic inductive guidelines for collecting and analyzing data for middle-range theoretical frameworks that explain the collected data"), we reconstructed the leitmotif (master code) using thematic in-depth interviews. (4) This leitmotif is: "We do not trust/believe our medicine/doctors." The leitmotif is exacerbated by patients' experiences in reproductive health care institutions. We also examine how women cope with needed medical assistance despite the trust deficit. We investigate patients' trust in public (insurance-covered and for-fee) and private (commercial) reproductive health services. We find that although women distrust both, they still confront the medical institutions and develop strategies to establish trust when seeking health care. Field data collected in 2005-6 consists of five participants' diaries and twenty-two in-depth interviews with female reproductive health service clients. (See appendix for the sample's description.) Our subjects were mostly middle-class women of reproductive age who had a postsecondary education. Most were private-sector professionals or ran their own small business. In this article, we discuss the reproductive health system reforms, providing institutional context for the clinical encounters. We then operationalize the concept of "trust" for our research purposes. We look at reproductive institutions, maternity-care institutions, and practitioners (gynecologists and obstetricians) as subjects of "trust." We analyze different medical encounters in reproductive health institutions. We use this material to portray (1) women's distrust of these institutions; (2) trust-establishing strategies; and (3) new reproductive health patients' construction of their identity as patients. …
当代俄罗斯生殖保健机构的患者:建立信任的策略
摘要:自20世纪90年代以来,俄罗斯生殖卫生保健系统发生了许多变化。这些变化给用户带来了新的机会,用户的要求也越来越高,知识也越来越渊博。与此同时,患者不信任保健机构和从业人员,这仍然是俄罗斯生殖保健最严重的问题之一。作者从患者的角度关注公共和私人生殖保健遭遇,关注妇女在怀孕和分娩期间的经历,解释患者对医疗机构的不信任,并研究患者为建立信任而制定的应对策略。年轻的、活跃的、受过教育的妇女不希望被当作苏联病人对待——纪律严明、无知、顺从。他们希望找到一个值得信赖的医生,接受可靠、舒适和就近的医疗服务。关键词:不信任,卫生保健,生殖,俄罗斯,战略,妇女**********俄罗斯生殖保健系统自20世纪90年代以来发生了巨大变化。这些变化反映了国家卫生保健系统的经济崩溃,医疗服务的商业化,并试图解决俄罗斯的人口问题。这些变化不仅给用户提供了新的选择和机会,而且也造成了获得优质医疗服务的不平等机会。俄罗斯对生殖健康做法的态度也发生了变化。妇女的要求越来越高,知识也越来越渊博:她们有意识地参与计划生育,包括避孕药具的使用和在互联网上探索保健选择。然而,患者对医疗机构和个人从业人员的普遍不信任仍然是俄罗斯生殖保健最严重的困境之一。(1)从Talcott Parsons的经典临床相遇模型开始,对医疗机构的信任问题进行了分析;(2)但之前对俄罗斯生殖健康系统中这一问题的研究很少。(3)在这里,我们从患者的角度关注公共和私人生殖健康诊所的遭遇,重点关注妇女在怀孕和分娩期间的经历。遵循一种自下而上的扎根理论策略(“收集和分析数据的系统归纳指南,用于解释收集到的数据的中间理论框架”),我们使用专题深度访谈重建了主题(主代码)。这个主题是:“我们不信任我们的药物/医生。”患者在生殖保健机构的经历加剧了这一主题。我们还研究了妇女如何在信任缺失的情况下应对所需的医疗援助。我们调查了患者对公共(保险覆盖和收费)和私人(商业)生殖健康服务的信任。我们发现,尽管妇女不信任两者,但她们在寻求医疗保健时仍然面对医疗机构并制定建立信任的策略。2005- 2006年收集的实地数据包括5名参与者的日记和22次对女性生殖健康服务客户的深入访谈。(参见附录中的示例描述。)我们的研究对象大多是受过高等教育的中产阶级育龄妇女。大多数是私营部门的专业人士或经营自己的小企业。在这篇文章中,我们讨论生殖健康系统改革,为临床遭遇提供制度背景。然后,我们将“信任”的概念用于我们的研究目的。我们将生殖机构、妇产保健机构和从业人员(妇科和产科医生)视为“信任”的对象。我们分析了生殖健康机构中不同的医疗遭遇。我们用这些材料来描绘:(1)女性对这些机构的不信任;(2)建立信任策略;(3)新型生殖健康患者对患者身份的建构。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Demokratizatsiya
Demokratizatsiya Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Occupying a unique niche among literary journals, ANQ is filled with short, incisive research-based articles about the literature of the English-speaking world and the language of literature. Contributors unravel obscure allusions, explain sources and analogues, and supply variant manuscript readings. Also included are Old English word studies, textual emendations, and rare correspondence from neglected archives. The journal is an essential source for professors and students, as well as archivists, bibliographers, biographers, editors, lexicographers, and textual scholars. With subjects from Chaucer and Milton to Fitzgerald and Welty, ANQ delves into the heart of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信