Justice in the Process of Regional Conflict Settlement: Analysis of Russia’s Strategy, 1992-2021

Q2 Arts and Humanities
N. Kaveshnikov
{"title":"Justice in the Process of Regional Conflict Settlement: Analysis of Russia’s Strategy, 1992-2021","authors":"N. Kaveshnikov","doi":"10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-2-215-227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in the field of regional conflict resolution rarely touches on the issue of justice. This paper aims to identify what understanding of international justice underlies Russia’s actions as a mediator/peacekeeper in the process of regional conflict resolution in the 1990s-2010s. The study also contributes to the understanding of Russia’s foreign policy by clarifying Moscow’s views on the essence and parameters of a just global order. The paper provides a study of the dominant Russian views on the essence of justice in international relations. It offers an insight into Russia’s peace-making and conflict resolution activities in the context of the three concepts of global justice and taking into account the factor of national interests. The study concludes that the dominant understanding of international justice in Russia is that which corresponds to Allen Buchanan’s concept of subjective justice. In Moscow’s view, international justice is a set of rules developed in the process of consensus driven negotiations between the great powers. According to this logic, a just settlement of the regional conflict is possible only on the basis of the consensus of the parties to the conflict and in accordance with the interests of the global and regional powers concerned. The fair interaction of the great powers in the settlement of the regional conflict and the impact that the conflict resolution could have on the development of the international order were of crucial importance for Moscow within the period under consideration. Moscow’s activity in the conflict resolution in the post-Soviet space generally corresponded to the model of justice as mutual recognition, but with absolute priority of Russian national interests. The strategy for resolving regional conflicts in the post-Soviet space could only be understood in the broad context of relations with Western countries and has changed in line with the development of these relations.","PeriodicalId":55752,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik RUDN International Relations","volume":"494 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik RUDN International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-2-215-227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research in the field of regional conflict resolution rarely touches on the issue of justice. This paper aims to identify what understanding of international justice underlies Russia’s actions as a mediator/peacekeeper in the process of regional conflict resolution in the 1990s-2010s. The study also contributes to the understanding of Russia’s foreign policy by clarifying Moscow’s views on the essence and parameters of a just global order. The paper provides a study of the dominant Russian views on the essence of justice in international relations. It offers an insight into Russia’s peace-making and conflict resolution activities in the context of the three concepts of global justice and taking into account the factor of national interests. The study concludes that the dominant understanding of international justice in Russia is that which corresponds to Allen Buchanan’s concept of subjective justice. In Moscow’s view, international justice is a set of rules developed in the process of consensus driven negotiations between the great powers. According to this logic, a just settlement of the regional conflict is possible only on the basis of the consensus of the parties to the conflict and in accordance with the interests of the global and regional powers concerned. The fair interaction of the great powers in the settlement of the regional conflict and the impact that the conflict resolution could have on the development of the international order were of crucial importance for Moscow within the period under consideration. Moscow’s activity in the conflict resolution in the post-Soviet space generally corresponded to the model of justice as mutual recognition, but with absolute priority of Russian national interests. The strategy for resolving regional conflicts in the post-Soviet space could only be understood in the broad context of relations with Western countries and has changed in line with the development of these relations.
地区冲突解决过程中的正义:1992-2021年俄罗斯战略分析
区域冲突解决领域的研究很少涉及司法问题。本文旨在确定俄罗斯在20世纪90年代至2010年代地区冲突解决过程中作为调解者/维和者的行为背后是对国际正义的什么样的理解。该研究还有助于理解俄罗斯的外交政策,澄清莫斯科对公正的全球秩序的本质和参数的看法。本文对俄罗斯关于国际关系中正义本质的主流观点进行了研究。它提供了一个洞察俄罗斯在全球正义的三个概念的背景下建立和平和解决冲突的活动,并考虑到国家利益的因素。研究认为,俄罗斯对国际正义的主流理解是与布坎南的主观正义概念相对应的。在莫斯科看来,国际正义是在大国之间达成共识的谈判过程中形成的一套规则。根据这一逻辑,只有在冲突各方达成共识的基础上,并符合有关全球和地区大国的利益,才有可能公正地解决地区冲突。大国在解决地区冲突中的公平互动,以及冲突的解决对国际秩序发展的影响,对莫斯科在考虑的时期至关重要。莫斯科在后苏联空间的冲突解决活动总体上符合作为相互承认的正义模式,但绝对优先考虑俄罗斯的国家利益。解决后苏联空间地区冲突的战略只能在与西方国家关系的大背景下理解,并随着这些关系的发展而改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vestnik RUDN International Relations
Vestnik RUDN International Relations Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信