The relation between religiosity dimensions and support for interreligious conflict in Indonesia

IF 0.8 3区哲学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1177/0084672419878824

T. Setiawan, E. D. de Jong, P. Scheepers, C. Sterkens

{"title":"The relation between religiosity dimensions and support for interreligious conflict in Indonesia","authors":"T. Setiawan, E. D. de Jong, P. Scheepers, C. Sterkens","doi":"10.1177/0084672419878824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we explain differences in support for interreligious lawful and violent protests against the religious outgroup. Combining religiosity and social identity approaches, we take three dimensions of religiosity (namely, practices, beliefs and salience) into consideration related to support for interreligious conflict, next to relevant control characteristics. The analysis is based on survey data (N = 2026) collected among a random sample of Muslims (n = 1451) and Christians (n = 575) across the Indonesian archipelago. Our findings show that members of the Muslim community are, on average, more inclined to support interreligious conflict, both lawful and violent protests. Participation in rites of passage is a crucial aspect of religious practices found to be positively related to both kinds of protest. Religious beliefs show great importance but vary in their influence: particularistic views and intratextual fundamentalism are related to support for lawful protest, whereas religiocentrism is related to support both for lawful and violent protests. In contrast, salience reduces support for violent protest. As such, the findings offer a differentiated way to understand present-day interreligious conflicts among the general population in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":44899,"journal":{"name":"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672419878824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Abstract

In this study, we explain differences in support for interreligious lawful and violent protests against the religious outgroup. Combining religiosity and social identity approaches, we take three dimensions of religiosity (namely, practices, beliefs and salience) into consideration related to support for interreligious conflict, next to relevant control characteristics. The analysis is based on survey data (N = 2026) collected among a random sample of Muslims (n = 1451) and Christians (n = 575) across the Indonesian archipelago. Our findings show that members of the Muslim community are, on average, more inclined to support interreligious conflict, both lawful and violent protests. Participation in rites of passage is a crucial aspect of religious practices found to be positively related to both kinds of protest. Religious beliefs show great importance but vary in their influence: particularistic views and intratextual fundamentalism are related to support for lawful protest, whereas religiocentrism is related to support both for lawful and violent protests. In contrast, salience reduces support for violent protest. As such, the findings offer a differentiated way to understand present-day interreligious conflicts among the general population in Indonesia.

查看原文本刊更多论文

印尼宗教信仰维度与宗教间冲突支持的关系

在本研究中，我们解释了对宗教间合法抗议和对宗教外群体暴力抗议的支持差异。结合宗教性和社会认同方法，我们考虑了宗教性的三个维度(即实践、信仰和突出性)与支持宗教间冲突的关系，以及相关的控制特征。该分析基于在印度尼西亚群岛上随机收集的穆斯林(N = 1451)和基督徒(N = 575)的调查数据(N = 2026)。我们的调查结果显示，穆斯林社区的成员平均而言更倾向于支持宗教间冲突，无论是合法的还是暴力的抗议。参与成人仪式是宗教实践的一个重要方面，被发现与这两种抗议呈正相关。宗教信仰非常重要，但其影响各不相同:特殊观点和经文内原教旨主义与支持合法抗议有关，而宗教中心主义与支持合法和暴力抗议有关。相反，知名度降低了对暴力抗议的支持。因此，这些发现提供了一种不同的方式来理解当今印度尼西亚普通人群中的宗教间冲突。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie Multiple-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The international, peer-reviewed journal Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie is the oldest periodical that publishes research in the psychology of religion. It is the organ of the International Association for the Psychology of Religion (IAPR), founded in 1914. The Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie is open to all scientific methodologies, both quantitative and qualitative.