Music Theory Pedagogy in the Nineteenth Century

IF 0.7 1区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Bjørnar Utne-Reitan
{"title":"Music Theory Pedagogy in the Nineteenth Century","authors":"Bjørnar Utne-Reitan","doi":"10.1215/00222909-9534139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n What characterized conservatory music theory pedagogy in nineteenth-century Europe? This article discusses the traditions of music theory pedagogy associated with the conservatories in Paris, Vienna, and Leipzig, specifically focusing on the middle of the nineteenth century (ca. 1830–70). In the first section, the characteristics of the three individual traditions are discussed separately. The second section compares these traditions from three perspectives: theoretical framework, pedagogical approach, and historical legacy. Although the traditions are different on several central points (e.g., ties to Italian partimento pedagogy in Paris, to Ramellian fundamental bass in Vienna, and to Weberian Roman numeral analysis in Leipzig), they also have some fundamental similarities that drew the borders—the defining limits—of conservatory music theory. The author argues that in the nineteenth century the idea of music theory as a primarily written discipline (centered on textbooks and written exercises and largely separated from musical performance) became a central element of these general characteristics of music theory pedagogy that would be taken for granted and accepted as self-evident across institutional traditions.","PeriodicalId":45025,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MUSIC THEORY","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MUSIC THEORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00222909-9534139","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What characterized conservatory music theory pedagogy in nineteenth-century Europe? This article discusses the traditions of music theory pedagogy associated with the conservatories in Paris, Vienna, and Leipzig, specifically focusing on the middle of the nineteenth century (ca. 1830–70). In the first section, the characteristics of the three individual traditions are discussed separately. The second section compares these traditions from three perspectives: theoretical framework, pedagogical approach, and historical legacy. Although the traditions are different on several central points (e.g., ties to Italian partimento pedagogy in Paris, to Ramellian fundamental bass in Vienna, and to Weberian Roman numeral analysis in Leipzig), they also have some fundamental similarities that drew the borders—the defining limits—of conservatory music theory. The author argues that in the nineteenth century the idea of music theory as a primarily written discipline (centered on textbooks and written exercises and largely separated from musical performance) became a central element of these general characteristics of music theory pedagogy that would be taken for granted and accepted as self-evident across institutional traditions.
十九世纪的音乐理论教学法
19世纪欧洲音乐学院音乐理论教学的特点是什么?本文讨论了与巴黎、维也纳和莱比锡音乐学院相关的音乐理论教学法的传统,特别关注十九世纪中期(约1830 - 1870年)。在第一部分中,分别讨论了三个独立传统的特点。第二部分从三个方面对这些传统进行比较:理论框架、教学方法和历史遗产。尽管这些传统在几个中心点上有所不同(例如,与巴黎的意大利派托托教学法的联系,与维也纳的拉米利基础低音的联系,以及与莱比锡的韦伯罗马数字分析的联系),但它们也有一些基本的相似之处,这些相似之处划定了音乐学院音乐理论的界限——定义界限。作者认为,在19世纪,音乐理论作为一门主要的书面学科(以教科书和书面练习为中心,在很大程度上与音乐表演分离)的想法成为了音乐理论教学法这些一般特征的核心要素,这些特征被认为是理所当然的,并被接受为跨机构传统的不言而喻的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信