‘Sorry we do not deliver to your area’: geographical inequalities in online groceries provision

IF 2.9 Q2 BUSINESS
A. Newing, Nick Hood, Francisco Videira, Jack Lewis
{"title":"‘Sorry we do not deliver to your area’: geographical inequalities in online groceries provision","authors":"A. Newing, Nick Hood, Francisco Videira, Jack Lewis","doi":"10.1080/09593969.2021.2017321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The British grocery retail sector is experiencing rapid growth in online ordering for home delivery, resulting in considerable supply side investment in delivery and fulfilment infrastructure. For retailers with a physical store network, investments typically utilise larger format stores as delivery and fulfilment hubs. Proximity to the store network and delivery infrastructure capacity thus drive the availability and choice of online groceries provider at the neighbourhood level. We aim to assess the geographical extent of online groceries coverage at a small-area level in Great Britain (GB). We carry out a nationwide assessment of the provision of online groceries, revealing generally excellent coverage within urban and suburban areas, including those neighbourhoods that may have once been considered urban food deserts. However, rural–urban inequalities are evident, with the most remote and rural catchments experiencing comparatively poor online groceries provision. We argue that these inequalities give rise to a new form of food desert: remote and rural neighbourhoods with the compounded effects of poor access to physical retail provision (akin to ‘traditional’ food deserts) and the additional disadvantage of poor coverage by online groceries providers. Many of these neighbourhoods are already the most remote from physical store provision and may also be faced with withdrawal of physical (retail) services. We make a number of recommendations that could support the provision of online groceries services in these areas and reflect on the tremendous potential for ongoing research into widening inequalities in access to grocery retailing driven by the geography of online groceries.","PeriodicalId":47139,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research","volume":"33 1","pages":"80 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Retail Distribution and Consumer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2021.2017321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT The British grocery retail sector is experiencing rapid growth in online ordering for home delivery, resulting in considerable supply side investment in delivery and fulfilment infrastructure. For retailers with a physical store network, investments typically utilise larger format stores as delivery and fulfilment hubs. Proximity to the store network and delivery infrastructure capacity thus drive the availability and choice of online groceries provider at the neighbourhood level. We aim to assess the geographical extent of online groceries coverage at a small-area level in Great Britain (GB). We carry out a nationwide assessment of the provision of online groceries, revealing generally excellent coverage within urban and suburban areas, including those neighbourhoods that may have once been considered urban food deserts. However, rural–urban inequalities are evident, with the most remote and rural catchments experiencing comparatively poor online groceries provision. We argue that these inequalities give rise to a new form of food desert: remote and rural neighbourhoods with the compounded effects of poor access to physical retail provision (akin to ‘traditional’ food deserts) and the additional disadvantage of poor coverage by online groceries providers. Many of these neighbourhoods are already the most remote from physical store provision and may also be faced with withdrawal of physical (retail) services. We make a number of recommendations that could support the provision of online groceries services in these areas and reflect on the tremendous potential for ongoing research into widening inequalities in access to grocery retailing driven by the geography of online groceries.
“对不起,我们没有送货到您所在地区”:网上杂货供应的地域不平等
英国杂货零售部门正在经历快速增长的在线订购送货上门,导致相当大的供给侧投资在交付和履行基础设施。对于拥有实体店网络的零售商来说,投资通常利用大型商店作为交付和履行中心。因此,邻近的商店网络和交付基础设施能力推动了社区一级在线杂货供应商的可用性和选择。我们的目标是评估在线杂货覆盖在英国(GB)小区域水平的地理范围。我们在全国范围内对网上杂货的供应进行了评估,结果显示,在城市和郊区,包括那些曾经被认为是城市食品沙漠的社区,网上杂货的覆盖范围普遍很好。然而,城乡之间的不平等是显而易见的,最偏远和农村地区的在线杂货供应相对较差。我们认为,这些不平等导致了一种新形式的食物沙漠:偏远和农村社区,难以获得实体零售供应(类似于“传统的”食物沙漠),以及在线杂货供应商覆盖率低的额外劣势。这些社区中有许多已经离实体商店供应最遥远,也可能面临实体(零售)服务的撤出。我们提出了一些建议,这些建议可以支持在这些地区提供在线杂货服务,并反映了在线杂货的地理位置所驱动的杂货零售渠道日益扩大的不平等,这一正在进行的研究的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信