The Application of Realtime Fluorescence Quantitative PCR for Prenatal Screening of Group B Streptococcal Infections

Changzhi Xu, Donglin Zhu, Zhizhi Xie, Yun Xi
{"title":"The Application of Realtime Fluorescence Quantitative PCR for Prenatal Screening of Group B Streptococcal Infections","authors":"Changzhi Xu, Donglin Zhu, Zhizhi Xie, Yun Xi","doi":"10.30564/JAMS.V2I3.669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: In the prenatal screening, several different methods were used to detect the presence of group B streptococcus (GBS) infection, in this assay, the diagnostic value and clinical signifcance of the application of realtime fluorescent PCR were explored. Methods: A total of 86 women with 35-37 weeks pregnancy were enrolled, vaginal secretion samples were collected. Fluorescence PCR, bacterial culture and gene sequencing were used to detect whether there was GBS infection, and the results obtained were compared and analyzed. Results: 10 subjects were detected to be positive for GBS by fluorescence PCR (the positive rate was 11.6%), however, only 4 cases were positive for GBS by bacterial culture method (the positive rate was 4.7%). There was a statistically signifcant difference in the positive rate between the two methods (P<0.01). Compared with the results of gene sequencing, the detection of GBS infection by fluorescence PCR has an accuracy of 95.2%, and the sensitivity was 90.9% with 100% specificity. Conclusion: The application of realtime fluorescence quantitative PCR for the detection of GBS infection is signifcantly better than the use of bacterial culture method. Compared with the gold standard method (gene sequencing method), its detection effciency, accuracy, sensitivity and specifcity are relatively high. In summary, PCR for prenatal screening of GBS is worthy of promotion in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":14958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medicine Science","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medicine Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30564/JAMS.V2I3.669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In the prenatal screening, several different methods were used to detect the presence of group B streptococcus (GBS) infection, in this assay, the diagnostic value and clinical signifcance of the application of realtime fluorescent PCR were explored. Methods: A total of 86 women with 35-37 weeks pregnancy were enrolled, vaginal secretion samples were collected. Fluorescence PCR, bacterial culture and gene sequencing were used to detect whether there was GBS infection, and the results obtained were compared and analyzed. Results: 10 subjects were detected to be positive for GBS by fluorescence PCR (the positive rate was 11.6%), however, only 4 cases were positive for GBS by bacterial culture method (the positive rate was 4.7%). There was a statistically signifcant difference in the positive rate between the two methods (P<0.01). Compared with the results of gene sequencing, the detection of GBS infection by fluorescence PCR has an accuracy of 95.2%, and the sensitivity was 90.9% with 100% specificity. Conclusion: The application of realtime fluorescence quantitative PCR for the detection of GBS infection is signifcantly better than the use of bacterial culture method. Compared with the gold standard method (gene sequencing method), its detection effciency, accuracy, sensitivity and specifcity are relatively high. In summary, PCR for prenatal screening of GBS is worthy of promotion in clinical practice.
实时荧光定量PCR在产前B群链球菌感染筛查中的应用
目的:在产前筛查中,采用几种不同的方法检测B族链球菌(GBS)感染的存在,探讨实时荧光PCR应用的诊断价值和临床意义。方法:选取妊娠35 ~ 37周的孕妇86例,采集阴道分泌物标本。采用荧光PCR、细菌培养和基因测序检测是否存在GBS感染,并对所得结果进行比较分析。结果:荧光PCR检测GBS阳性10例(阳性率11.6%),细菌培养法检测GBS阳性4例(阳性率4.7%)。两种方法的阳性率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。与基因测序结果相比,荧光PCR检测GBS感染的准确率为95.2%,灵敏度为90.9%,特异性为100%。结论:应用实时荧光定量PCR检测GBS感染的效果明显优于细菌培养法。与金标准法(基因测序法)相比,其检测效率、准确性、灵敏度和特异性都相对较高。综上所述,PCR产前筛查GBS是值得临床推广的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信