{"title":"Expatriate academics: what have we known for four decades? A systematic literature review","authors":"S. Przytuła","doi":"10.1108/jgm-03-2023-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe main objective of this paper is twofold: to analyse the progress of a research stream concerning expatriate academics in the last four decades and to make recommendations for further studies in this field.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, the systematic literature review (SLR) concerning expatriate academics was applied. The search embraced the period from 1980–2022. The review was performed in two interdisciplinary electronic databases: Web of Science and Scopus. The selection process of papers was conducted in steps, as recommended by the PRISMA protocol. The total pool of articles received after the exclusion criteria was 110. The content of each paper was thus extracted and categorised in Excel file: author, year of publication, tittle of article, journal, theory applied, research method, sample size, country/field of investigation.FindingsFor almost three decades this topic was almost absent in the literature of the subject. The most active publication period started from 2009 and since then there have been two “waves” of published articles devoted to expatriate academics: 2009–2014 and 2017–2021. The significant number of studies appeared in Journal of Global Mobility followed by Personnel Review, IJHRM, Higher Education. The thematic analysis revealed six themes which have been already researched on expatriates academics: (1) motives, (2) adjustment, (3) job factors and work outcomes, (4) academic missions, (5) academic career, (6) women and men in academia.Practical implicationsPractitioners and university management might find this article useful as the article allows to manage this pool of international academics more efficiently with mutual benefits for expatriates and organisations. This study may assist the university authorities to develop systemic approach to attract foreign academics; adjust the same in work and culture domain through effective training; support in organisational, financial and career field; create the performance criteria of expatriate work related to three missions: research, teaching and service; introduce metrics and indicators to evaluate the contribution and work outcomes of foreign scientists into the host university.Originality/valueThis review shows that there are many new perspectives and models through which the academic expatriation can be analysed. This paper gives an insight into the academic literature on academics expatriates. The paper is innovative and has contributed to research by doing an SLR in a new area (academic expats) and tackling all the areas that has been covered by academic research so far. New research directions have been recommended for future research, to open the field further.","PeriodicalId":44863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Mobility-The Home of Expatriate Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Mobility-The Home of Expatriate Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgm-03-2023-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeThe main objective of this paper is twofold: to analyse the progress of a research stream concerning expatriate academics in the last four decades and to make recommendations for further studies in this field.Design/methodology/approachIn this study, the systematic literature review (SLR) concerning expatriate academics was applied. The search embraced the period from 1980–2022. The review was performed in two interdisciplinary electronic databases: Web of Science and Scopus. The selection process of papers was conducted in steps, as recommended by the PRISMA protocol. The total pool of articles received after the exclusion criteria was 110. The content of each paper was thus extracted and categorised in Excel file: author, year of publication, tittle of article, journal, theory applied, research method, sample size, country/field of investigation.FindingsFor almost three decades this topic was almost absent in the literature of the subject. The most active publication period started from 2009 and since then there have been two “waves” of published articles devoted to expatriate academics: 2009–2014 and 2017–2021. The significant number of studies appeared in Journal of Global Mobility followed by Personnel Review, IJHRM, Higher Education. The thematic analysis revealed six themes which have been already researched on expatriates academics: (1) motives, (2) adjustment, (3) job factors and work outcomes, (4) academic missions, (5) academic career, (6) women and men in academia.Practical implicationsPractitioners and university management might find this article useful as the article allows to manage this pool of international academics more efficiently with mutual benefits for expatriates and organisations. This study may assist the university authorities to develop systemic approach to attract foreign academics; adjust the same in work and culture domain through effective training; support in organisational, financial and career field; create the performance criteria of expatriate work related to three missions: research, teaching and service; introduce metrics and indicators to evaluate the contribution and work outcomes of foreign scientists into the host university.Originality/valueThis review shows that there are many new perspectives and models through which the academic expatriation can be analysed. This paper gives an insight into the academic literature on academics expatriates. The paper is innovative and has contributed to research by doing an SLR in a new area (academic expats) and tackling all the areas that has been covered by academic research so far. New research directions have been recommended for future research, to open the field further.
本文的主要目的有两个:分析过去四十年来有关外籍学者的研究进展,并为该领域的进一步研究提出建议。本研究采用外籍学者的系统文献回顾法(SLR)。研究涵盖了1980年至2022年这段时间。该综述在两个跨学科电子数据库中进行:Web of Science和Scopus。根据PRISMA协议的建议,论文的选择过程是分步骤进行的。排除标准后收到的文章总数为110篇。因此,每篇论文的内容被提取并分类在Excel文件中:作者、出版年份、文章标题、期刊、应用理论、研究方法、样本量、调查国家/领域。在近三十年的时间里,这个话题在这一主题的文献中几乎是缺席的。最活跃的出版期始于2009年,此后出现了两波专门针对外籍学者的出版文章:2009 - 2014年和2017-2021年。大量的研究发表在《全球流动杂志》上,其次是《人事评论》、《人力资源管理》和《高等教育》。主题分析揭示了已经对外籍学者进行研究的六个主题:(1)动机,(2)调整,(3)工作因素和工作成果,(4)学术使命,(5)学术生涯,(6)学术界的女性和男性。实践者和大学管理层可能会发现这篇文章很有用,因为这篇文章允许更有效地管理这群国际学者,对外籍人士和组织都有好处。这项研究可协助大学当局制订系统的方法,以吸引外国学者;通过有效的培训,在工作和文化领域进行调整;在组织、财务和职业领域提供支持;制定与研究、教学和服务三项任务有关的外派工作绩效标准;引入标准和指标来评估外国科学家对东道国大学的贡献和工作成果。原创性/价值这一综述表明,有许多新的视角和模型可以用来分析学术外派。本文对学者外籍人士的学术文献进行了梳理。这篇论文是创新的,通过在一个新的领域(学术外籍人士)进行单反研究,并解决了迄今为止学术研究所涵盖的所有领域,为研究做出了贡献。为今后的研究提出了新的研究方向,以进一步开拓这一领域。