Comparative evaluation of scales for predicting an unfavorable postoperative outcome: Preliminary results of the multicenter study “The role of concomitant diseases in the stratification of the risk of postoperative complications in abdominal surgery STOPRISK"

I. Zabolotskikh, N. Trembach, M. Magomedov, V. G. Krasnov, L. Chernienko, S. N. Shevyrev, A. S. Popov, E. Tyutyunova, S. Vatutin, Y. Malyshev, E.A. Popov, A. A. Smolin, I. Kitiashvili, A. A. Dmitriev, E. Grigoryev, E. Kameneva, V. V. Fisher, E. V. Volkov, I. Yatsuk, D. Levit, A. Sharipov, V. Khoronenko, M. Shemetova, V. N. Kokhno, E. Polovnikov, A. P. Spasova, A. V. Mironov, V. R. Davydova, K. Shapovalov, A. Gritsan, S. V. Sorsunov, K. M. Lebedinskii, P. Dunts, V. Rudnov, V. Stadler, A. Bayalieva, M. Prigorodov, V. Antonov, D. Voroshin, A. Ovezov, A. Pivovarov, D. Martynov, O.A. Batigyan, M. Zamyatin, S. Voskanyan, A. A. Astakhov, A. Khoteev, D. Protsenko, N. Arıkan, I. Zakharchenko, A. S. Matveev, I.A. Trembach, T. Musaeva
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of scales for predicting an unfavorable postoperative outcome: Preliminary results of the multicenter study “The role of concomitant diseases in the stratification of the risk of postoperative complications in abdominal surgery STOPRISK\"","authors":"I. Zabolotskikh, N. Trembach, M. Magomedov, V. G. Krasnov, L. Chernienko, S. N. Shevyrev, A. S. Popov, E. Tyutyunova, S. Vatutin, Y. Malyshev, E.A. Popov, A. A. Smolin, I. Kitiashvili, A. A. Dmitriev, E. Grigoryev, E. Kameneva, V. V. Fisher, E. V. Volkov, I. Yatsuk, D. Levit, A. Sharipov, V. Khoronenko, M. Shemetova, V. N. Kokhno, E. Polovnikov, A. P. Spasova, A. V. Mironov, V. R. Davydova, K. Shapovalov, A. Gritsan, S. V. Sorsunov, K. M. Lebedinskii, P. Dunts, V. Rudnov, V. Stadler, A. Bayalieva, M. Prigorodov, V. Antonov, D. Voroshin, A. Ovezov, A. Pivovarov, D. Martynov, O.A. Batigyan, M. Zamyatin, S. Voskanyan, A. A. Astakhov, A. Khoteev, D. Protsenko, N. Arıkan, I. Zakharchenko, A. S. Matveev, I.A. Trembach, T. Musaeva","doi":"10.21320/1818-474x-2022-3-27-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION. The need for accurate risk stratification is obvious. Modern methods are quite cumbersome, which can cause difficulties when applied in routine practice, and therefore relatively simple but accurate forecasting methods have become very popular, which, however, have not been validated in Russia: SORT (Surgical Outcome Risk Tool), SRS (Surgical Risk Scale), POSPOM (Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality), NZRISK (New Zealand RISK), SMPM (Surgical Mortality Probability Model). OBJECTIVES. The aim of this work is to determine the prognostic value of risk assessment scales in predicting an unfavorable postoperative outcome based on the analysis of data obtained in the STOPRISK study in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The analysis of data on perioperative parameters of 1,179 patients who underwent open abdominal surgery is presented. RESULTS. The fatal outcome was recorded in 14 patients (1.18 %). A total of 135 complications were registered in 92 patients (7.8 %). All scales demonstrated satisfactory prognostic value in assessing the risk of complications (the area under the operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the Physical Status Scale of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) was 0.714 (0.687-0.739), for the Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) - 0.727 (0.701-0.753), for the Surgical Outcome Risk Scale (SORT) - 0.738 (0.712-0.763), for the New Zealand Risk Scale (NZRISK) - 0.763 (0.738-0.787)), for the Surgical Mortality Probability Scale (SMPM) - 0.732 (0.706-0.757), for the Preoperative Postoperative mortality Prediction Scale (POSPOM) - 0.764 (0.738-0.788)) and good in assessing the risk of death (AUROC for the ASA scale was 0.82 (0.804-0.843), for the SRS scale - 0.860 (0.838-0.879), for the SORT scale - 0.860 (0.838-0.879), for the NZRISK scale - 0.807 (0.783-0.829), for the SMPM scale - 0.852 (0.831-0.872), for the POSPOM scale - 0.811 (0.788-0.833)). CONCLUSIONS. All the studied scales have good prognostic value in assessing the risk of 30-day mortality after major abdominal surgery. The NZRISK and POSPOM scales demonstrate good prognostic value for cardiovascular complications, POSPOM and SRS scales - for acute renal injury. POSPOM and NZRISK scales showed an excellent prognostic value in relation to the risk of postoperative delirium.","PeriodicalId":93261,"journal":{"name":"Annals of pulmonary and critical care medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of pulmonary and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474x-2022-3-27-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The need for accurate risk stratification is obvious. Modern methods are quite cumbersome, which can cause difficulties when applied in routine practice, and therefore relatively simple but accurate forecasting methods have become very popular, which, however, have not been validated in Russia: SORT (Surgical Outcome Risk Tool), SRS (Surgical Risk Scale), POSPOM (Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality), NZRISK (New Zealand RISK), SMPM (Surgical Mortality Probability Model). OBJECTIVES. The aim of this work is to determine the prognostic value of risk assessment scales in predicting an unfavorable postoperative outcome based on the analysis of data obtained in the STOPRISK study in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The analysis of data on perioperative parameters of 1,179 patients who underwent open abdominal surgery is presented. RESULTS. The fatal outcome was recorded in 14 patients (1.18 %). A total of 135 complications were registered in 92 patients (7.8 %). All scales demonstrated satisfactory prognostic value in assessing the risk of complications (the area under the operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the Physical Status Scale of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) was 0.714 (0.687-0.739), for the Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) - 0.727 (0.701-0.753), for the Surgical Outcome Risk Scale (SORT) - 0.738 (0.712-0.763), for the New Zealand Risk Scale (NZRISK) - 0.763 (0.738-0.787)), for the Surgical Mortality Probability Scale (SMPM) - 0.732 (0.706-0.757), for the Preoperative Postoperative mortality Prediction Scale (POSPOM) - 0.764 (0.738-0.788)) and good in assessing the risk of death (AUROC for the ASA scale was 0.82 (0.804-0.843), for the SRS scale - 0.860 (0.838-0.879), for the SORT scale - 0.860 (0.838-0.879), for the NZRISK scale - 0.807 (0.783-0.829), for the SMPM scale - 0.852 (0.831-0.872), for the POSPOM scale - 0.811 (0.788-0.833)). CONCLUSIONS. All the studied scales have good prognostic value in assessing the risk of 30-day mortality after major abdominal surgery. The NZRISK and POSPOM scales demonstrate good prognostic value for cardiovascular complications, POSPOM and SRS scales - for acute renal injury. POSPOM and NZRISK scales showed an excellent prognostic value in relation to the risk of postoperative delirium.
预测不良术后结局的量表的比较评价:多中心研究“伴随疾病在腹部手术术后并发症风险分层中的作用STOPRISK”的初步结果
介绍。对风险进行准确分层的必要性是显而易见的。现代方法相当繁琐,在日常实践中应用会遇到困难,因此相对简单但准确的预测方法非常流行,但在俄罗斯尚未得到验证:SORT(手术结局风险工具),SRS(手术风险量表),POSPOM(术前评分预测术后死亡率),NZRISK(新西兰风险),SMPM(手术死亡率概率模型)。目标。本研究的目的是基于STOPRISK研究中对腹部开腹手术患者的数据分析,确定风险评估量表在预测不良术后结局方面的预后价值。材料和方法。本文对1179例剖腹手术患者的围手术期参数进行分析。结果。死亡14例(1.18%)。92例患者(7.8%)共发生135例并发症。所有量表在评估并发症风险方面均表现出令人满意的预后价值(美国麻醉师学会(ASA)身体状况量表(ASA)的操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.714(0.687-0.739),手术风险量表(SRS)为0.727(0.701-0.753),手术结局风险量表(SORT)为0.738(0.712-0.763),新西兰风险量表(NZRISK)为0.763(0.738-0.787))。手术死亡率概率量表(SMPM) - 0.732(0.706 - -0.757),术前术后死亡率预测量表(POSPOM) - 0.764(0.738 - -0.788)),在死亡的风险评估(ASA规模AUROC为0.82(0.804 - -0.843),规模的SRS - 0.860(0.838 - -0.879),对于规模- 0.860 (0.838 - -0.879),NZRISK规模- 0.807 (0.783 - -0.829),SMPM规模- 0.852 (0.831 - -0.872),POSPOM规模- 0.811(0.788 - -0.833))。结论。所有研究的量表在评估腹部大手术后30天死亡风险方面都具有良好的预后价值。NZRISK和POSPOM量表对心血管并发症具有良好的预后价值,而POSPOM和SRS量表对急性肾损伤具有良好的预后价值。posom和NZRISK量表对术后谵妄的风险有很好的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信