Engineering roles in Building with Nature interdisciplinary design

Q3 Social Sciences
R. Klaassen, Baukje Kothuis, J. Slinger
{"title":"Engineering roles in Building with Nature interdisciplinary design","authors":"R. Klaassen, Baukje Kothuis, J. Slinger","doi":"10.47982/RIUS.7.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building with Nature (BwN) infrastructure designs are characterised by disciplinary integration, non-linearity, diverse and fluid design requirements, and long-term time frames that balance the limitations of earth’s natural systems and the socio-technical systems created by humans. Differentiating roles in the engineering design process may offer strategies for better solutions. Four complementary engineering design roles were distinguished, namely: Specialists, System Integrators, Front-end Innovators, and Contextual Engineers. The key research question addressed in this paper asks, how can the introduction of engineering roles enhance interdisciplinary processes for BwN design? Three Building with Nature design workshops with international groups of students from multiple disciplines and various education levels provided the ideal context for investigating whether engineering roles enhance such interdisciplinary ways of working. Results indicate that the application of engineering roles in each of the three workshops indeed supported interdisciplinary design. A number of conditions for successful implementation within an authentic learning environment could be identified. The engineering roles sustain an early, divergent way of looking at the design problem and support the search for common ground across the diverse perspectives of the team members, each bringing different disciplinary backgrounds to the design table. The chapter closes with a discussion on the value of engineering design roles and their significance for the Building with Nature approach.","PeriodicalId":34379,"journal":{"name":"Research in Urbanism Series","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Urbanism Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47982/RIUS.7.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Building with Nature (BwN) infrastructure designs are characterised by disciplinary integration, non-linearity, diverse and fluid design requirements, and long-term time frames that balance the limitations of earth’s natural systems and the socio-technical systems created by humans. Differentiating roles in the engineering design process may offer strategies for better solutions. Four complementary engineering design roles were distinguished, namely: Specialists, System Integrators, Front-end Innovators, and Contextual Engineers. The key research question addressed in this paper asks, how can the introduction of engineering roles enhance interdisciplinary processes for BwN design? Three Building with Nature design workshops with international groups of students from multiple disciplines and various education levels provided the ideal context for investigating whether engineering roles enhance such interdisciplinary ways of working. Results indicate that the application of engineering roles in each of the three workshops indeed supported interdisciplinary design. A number of conditions for successful implementation within an authentic learning environment could be identified. The engineering roles sustain an early, divergent way of looking at the design problem and support the search for common ground across the diverse perspectives of the team members, each bringing different disciplinary backgrounds to the design table. The chapter closes with a discussion on the value of engineering design roles and their significance for the Building with Nature approach.
建筑与自然跨学科设计中的工程角色
建筑与自然(BwN)基础设施设计的特点是学科整合、非线性、多样化和流动的设计要求,以及平衡地球自然系统和人类创造的社会技术系统局限性的长期时间框架。在工程设计过程中区分不同的角色可以为更好的解决方案提供策略。区分了四个互补的工程设计角色,即:专家、系统集成商、前端创新者和上下文工程师。本文提出的关键研究问题是,工程角色的引入如何增强BwN设计的跨学科过程?来自不同学科和不同教育水平的国际学生团体参加了三个“自然建筑”设计研讨会,为研究工程角色是否能增强这种跨学科的工作方式提供了理想的环境。结果表明,在三个工作坊中,工程角色的应用确实支持了跨学科设计。可以确定在真实的学习环境中成功实施的一些条件。工程角色维持一种早期的、发散的方式来看待设计问题,并支持在团队成员的不同观点中寻找共同点,每个人都为设计表带来不同的学科背景。本章最后讨论了工程设计角色的价值及其对“建筑与自然”方法的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Urbanism Series
Research in Urbanism Series Social Sciences-Urban Studies
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信