A 2020 Vision of Subsurface Drip Irrigation in the U.S.

IF 1.4 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
F. Lamm, P. Colaizzi, R. Sorensen, J. Bordovsky, M. Dougherty, K. Balkcom, D. Zaccaria, K. Bali, D. Rudnick, R. Peters
{"title":"A 2020 Vision of Subsurface Drip Irrigation in the U.S.","authors":"F. Lamm, P. Colaizzi, R. Sorensen, J. Bordovsky, M. Dougherty, K. Balkcom, D. Zaccaria, K. Bali, D. Rudnick, R. Peters","doi":"10.13031/trans.14555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HighlightsSubsurface drip irrigation (SDI) has continued to expand in irrigation area within the U.S. during the last 15 years.Research with SDI continues for multiple crop types (fiber, grain and oilseed, horticultural, forage, and turf).SDI usage on many crops has matured through research and development of appropriate strategies and technologiesDespite some persistent challenges to successful use of SDI, important opportunities exist for further adoption.Abstract. Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) offers several advantages over alternative irrigation systems when it is designed and installed correctly and when best management practices are adopted. These advantages include the ability to apply water and nutrients directly and efficiently within the crop root zone. Disadvantages of SDI in commercial agriculture relative to alternative irrigation systems include greater capital cost per unit land area (except for small land parcels), unfamiliar management and maintenance protocols that can exacerbate the potential for emitter clogging, the visibility of system attributes (components and design characteristics) and performance, and the susceptibility to damage (i.e., rodents and tillage) of the subsurface driplines. Despite these disadvantages, SDI continues to be adopted in commercial agriculture in the U.S., and research efforts to evaluate and develop SDI systems continue as well. This article summarizes recent progress in research (2010 to 2020) and the status of commercial adoption of SDI, along with a discussion of current challenges and future opportunities. Keywords: Drip Irrigation, Irrigation, Irrigation systems, Microirrigation, SDI, Water management.","PeriodicalId":23120,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the ASABE","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the ASABE","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.14555","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

HighlightsSubsurface drip irrigation (SDI) has continued to expand in irrigation area within the U.S. during the last 15 years.Research with SDI continues for multiple crop types (fiber, grain and oilseed, horticultural, forage, and turf).SDI usage on many crops has matured through research and development of appropriate strategies and technologiesDespite some persistent challenges to successful use of SDI, important opportunities exist for further adoption.Abstract. Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) offers several advantages over alternative irrigation systems when it is designed and installed correctly and when best management practices are adopted. These advantages include the ability to apply water and nutrients directly and efficiently within the crop root zone. Disadvantages of SDI in commercial agriculture relative to alternative irrigation systems include greater capital cost per unit land area (except for small land parcels), unfamiliar management and maintenance protocols that can exacerbate the potential for emitter clogging, the visibility of system attributes (components and design characteristics) and performance, and the susceptibility to damage (i.e., rodents and tillage) of the subsurface driplines. Despite these disadvantages, SDI continues to be adopted in commercial agriculture in the U.S., and research efforts to evaluate and develop SDI systems continue as well. This article summarizes recent progress in research (2010 to 2020) and the status of commercial adoption of SDI, along with a discussion of current challenges and future opportunities. Keywords: Drip Irrigation, Irrigation, Irrigation systems, Microirrigation, SDI, Water management.
2020年美国地下滴灌的远景
在过去的15年里,地下滴灌(SDI)在美国的灌溉面积不断扩大。SDI对多种作物类型(纤维、谷物和油籽、园艺、饲料和草皮)的研究仍在继续。通过研究和开发适当的策略和技术,SDI在许多作物上的应用已经成熟,尽管SDI的成功使用存在一些持续的挑战,但进一步采用SDI存在重要的机会。地下滴灌(SDI)在设计和安装正确并采用最佳管理实践的情况下,与其他灌溉系统相比具有若干优势。这些优点包括能够在作物根区直接有效地施用水分和养分。与替代灌溉系统相比,SDI在商业农业中的缺点包括单位土地面积的资本成本更高(小块土地除外),不熟悉的管理和维护协议可能加剧发射器堵塞的可能性,系统属性(组件和设计特征)和性能的可见性,以及地下管道对破坏(即啮齿动物和耕作)的易感性。尽管存在这些缺点,SDI仍继续在美国的商业农业中被采用,评估和开发SDI系统的研究工作也在继续。本文总结了最近的研究进展(2010年至2020年)和商业采用SDI的现状,并讨论了当前的挑战和未来的机遇。关键词:滴灌,灌溉,灌溉系统,微灌,SDI,水管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transactions of the ASABE
Transactions of the ASABE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal publishes research that advances the engineering of agricultural, food, and biological systems. Submissions must include original data, analysis or design, or synthesis of existing information; research information for the improvement of education, design, construction, or manufacturing practice; or significant and convincing evidence that confirms and strengthens the findings of others or that revises ideas or challenges accepted theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信